×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Research & Innovation

Caregivers & Technology: What They Want and Need A Guide for Innovators — Research from A Nationally Representative Sample of America’s 40 Million Family Caregivers

By
TMT Editorial Team
TMT Editorial Team

Abstract

No abstract available. Editor’s note: What follows is an abridged, illustration-rich presentation of research conducted for Project Catalyst (charged with positioning the 50+ consumer the center of innovation) by HITLAB (a healthcare innovation lab dedicated to improving the quality and accessibility of healthcare worldwide). HITLAB helps stakeholders in the public and private sectors technology-based solutions from concept to development and evaluation to meet pressing healthcare challenges.

References

1.
AARP.
2.
The Opportunity Costs of Informal Elder-Care in the United States: New Estimates from the American Time Use Survey.
3.
Caregiving in the United States. AARP. 2015;
4.
Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Selected Age Groups by Sex for the United States, States, Counties, and Puerto Rico Commonwealth and Municipios.
5.
Population Distribution by Race/Ethnicity. The Henry J Kaiser Foundation. 2014;
6.
U. Census Bureau in 2013.
7.
American Community Survey. 2014;
8.
Caregiving in the United States. Calif) Winter. 2015;(4):33–8.
9.
Family Caregiver Self-identification: Implications for Healthcare and /Social Service Professional. Dobrof and Ebenstein. (4):33–8.
10.
Tags barriers to technology, caregivers, HITLAB, innovators, market opportunity, medications management, Project Catalyst, technology, telemedicine process improvement, telemedicine program implementation, telemedicine remote health. 2013;

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.