×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Research & Innovation

Results from a Visual-Based Cervical Cancer Screening Program

By
Yael Misrahi
Yael Misrahi

Abstract

No abstract available.

Editor’s note: The 1st annual Future of Health: Telemedicine and AI summit was held on July 8, 2016 in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Ms. Misrahi was a member of the faculty, and the article that follows is based on her lecture.

References

1.
2015;(16).
2.
Usdhhs. Cervical cancer. 2013;
3.
Who. WHO guidelines for screening and treatment of precancerous lesions for cervical cancer prevention. 2013;(16).
4.
Mustafa R, Santesso N, Khatib R. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the accuracy of HPV tests, visual inspection with acetic acid, cytology, and colposcopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;(3):259–65.
5.
Selmouni F, Zidouh A, Alvarez-Plaza C, El Rhazi K. Perception and satisfaction of cervical cancer screening by Visual Inspection with Acetic acid (VIA) at Meknes-Tafilalet Region, Morocco: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Women’s Health. 2015;15(1).
6.
Patterson M, MacCallum C, Parthasarathy H, Sedwick C. The PLoS Community Journals. PLoS Biology. 2005;3(4):e129.
7.
Peterson C, Rose D, Mink J, Levitz D. Real-time monitoring and evaluation of a visual-based cervical cancer screening program using a decision support job aid. Diagnostics. 2016;(2).
8.
Quentin W, Adu-Sarkodie Y, Terris-Prestholt F. Costs of cervical cancer screening and treatment using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and cryotherapy in Ghana: the importance of scale. Trop Med Int Health. 2011;(3):379–89.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.