Conducting a Global Quadruple Aim Thematic Analysis of Telemedicine Performance in Rural Indigenous Populations and Evidence-Based Recommendations for Improvement
As telehealth is a growing form of healthcare delivery across the world, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic, it’s impact on patient populations particularly in aboriginal and rural communities boasts many questions. As the health disparities between aboriginal groups living in rural areas on reserves and the rest of the Canadian demographics remain to be mountainous, telemedicine is often seen as the new way forward in reducing these healthcare gaps. Presently, much research has been conducted on these cohorts, particularly in the health equity atmosphere. However, much of this research lacks a comprehensive framework or tool in which it analyzes the efficacy of outcomes. In this review paper, the quadruple aim – the ideal standard of care which North American health systems seek to conform to – will be used to analyze telemedicine performance, and assert evidence-based recommendations for improvement. Therefore, this paper seeks to conduct a thematic analysis on the various issues and barriers to telemedicine delivery and usage in aboriginal populations with respect to the quadruple aim as well as identifying evidence-based solutions to alleviate some of these concerns and bolster care.
Lavoie JG. Policy silences: why Canada needs a National First Nations, Inuit and Métis health policy. International Journal of Circumpolar Health. 2013;72(1):22690.
2.
Ballard D, Cook C, Roussin A, Gray A, K. Towards equity in Aboriginal health: An overview of factors impacting the delivery of health services to Aboriginal peoples of Canada. InCongress on Circumpolar Health. (7):388.
3.
Muttitt S, Vigneault R, Loewen L. Integrating telehealth into Aboriginal healthcare: the Canadian experience. International Journal of Circumpolar Health. 2004;63(4):401–14.
4.
Caffery LJ, Bradford NK, Wickramasinghe SI, Hayman N, Smith AC. Outcomes of using telehealth for the provision of healthcare to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: a systematic review. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2017;41(1):48–53.
5.
Dawson A, Walker R, Campbell J. Telehealth and indigenous populations around the world: A systematic review on current modalities for physical and mental health. mHealth. 2020;30.
6.
Kozera EK, Yang A, Murrell DF. Patient and practitioner satisfaction with tele-dermatology including Australia’s indigenous population: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Women’s Dermatology. 2016;2(3):70–3.
7.
Smith A, Armfield N, Wu WI. A mobile telemedicine-enabled ear screening service for Indigenous children in Queensland: Activity and outcomes in the first three years. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;485–9.
8.
Russell S, Quigley R, Strivens E, Miller G, Norrie J, Craig D, et al. Validation of the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment short form (KICA-screen) for telehealth. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2019;27(1):54–8.
9.
St Clair M, Murtagh D. Barriers to telehealth uptake in rural, regional, remote Australia: What can be done to expand telehealth access in remote areas? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;174–82.
10.
Wickramasinghe SI, Caffery LJ, Bradford NK, Smith AC. Enablers and barriers in providing telediabetes services for Indigenous communities: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2016;22(8):465–71.
11.
Jongbloed K, Pearce ME, Thomas V, Sharma R, Pooyak S, Demerais L, et al. The Cedar Project - Mobile Phone Use and Acceptability of Mobile Health Among Young Indigenous People Who Have Used Drugs in British Columbia, Canada: Mixed Methods Exploratory Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2020;8(7):e16783.
12.
Knight P, Bonney A, Teuss G, Guppy M, Lafferre D, Mullan J, et al. Positive Clinical Outcomes Are Synergistic With Positive Educational Outcomes When Using Telehealth Consulting in General Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2016;18(2):e31.
13.
Naqvi H. Conducting a Global Quadruple Aim Thematic Analysis of Telemedicine Performance in Rural Indigenous Populations and Evidence-Based Recommendations for Improvement. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2022;
14.
Buckley D, Weisser S. Videoconferencing could reduce the number of mental health patients transferred from outlying facilities to a regional mental health unit. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2012;36(5):478–82.
15.
Sabesan S. Specialist cancer care through <scp>T</scp>elehealth models. Australian Journal of Rural Health. 2015;23(1):19–23.
16.
Snoswell CL, Caffery LJ, Haydon HM, Wickramasinghe SI, Crumblin K, Smith AC. A cost-consequence analysis comparing patient travel, outreach, and telehealth clinic models for a specialist diabetes service to Indigenous people in Queensland. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2019;25(9):537–44.
17.
Yilmaz SK, Horn BP, Fore C, Bonham CA. An economic cost analysis of an expanding, multi-state behavioural telehealth intervention. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2018;25(6):353–64.
18.
Horn BP, Barragan GN, Fore C, Bonham CA. A cost comparison of travel models and behavioural telemedicine for rural, Native American populations in New Mexico. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2015;22(1):47–55.
19.
Wade V, Soar J, Gray L. Uptake of telehealth services funded by Medicare in Australia. Australian Health Review. 2014;38(5):528.
20.
Jennett P, Hall L, Hailey D. The socio-economic impact of telehealth: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;311–20.
21.
Razavi H, Copeland SP, Turner AW. Increasing the impact of teleophthalmology in Australia: Analysis of structural and economic drivers in a state service. Australian Journal of Rural Health. 2016;25(1):45–52.
22.
Mendez I, Jong M, Keays-White D. The use of remote presence for health care delivery in a northern Inuit community: A feasibility study. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2013;21112.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
