In June 2022, President Biden and Vice President Harris released their blueprint for addressing the maternal health crisis, stating their “vision for the future is that the United States will be considered the best country in the world to have a baby.” Currently, it is one of the worst among industrialized countries despite the US spending nearly double the average amount on healthcare per capita. The US is amidst a maternal mortality crisis, particularly for Black and American Indian/Alaska Native pregnant people, with more than 80% of the deaths preventable. Telehealth in obstetrics has the potential to reach pregnant people who are not currently being served by the medical system and to improve rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality; however, more research is needed to understand and monitor its equity, costs, and optimal usage. Extant research shows that telehealth can produce a small positive effect for certain obstetric health outcomes, but these research findings are rarely stratified by pregnant patients’ demographics. To prevent the perpetuation of existing health inequities, gaps in obstetric telehealth research will need to be addressed. Key knowledge gaps for researchers and policy makers include outcomes, access, satisfaction by patients and providers, potential time savings for patients, and health system cost savings. Implementation of equitable obstetric coverage of telehealth services requires clarity from private and public payers for inter-state provisions of care, liability and risk, and service and payment parity.
Note: While we use pregnant and postpartum people where possible here to recognize that not all pregnant people identify as women, we occasionally use maternal to reflect terminology used in federal, state, and local data.
Map CS. Interstate Medical Licensure Compact. 2023;
2.
Thao V, Dholakia R, Kreofsky BL, Moriarty JP, Colby CE, Demaerschalk BM, et al. Modeling the cost of teleneonatology from the health system perspective. Telemed J E Health [Internet. 2022;
3.
Snoswell CL, Taylor ML, Comans TA, Smith AC, Gray LC, Caffery LJ. Determining if Telehealth Can Reduce Health System Costs: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(10):e17298.
4.
Dooley MJ, Simpson KN, Simpson AN, Nietert PJ, Williams JD, King K, et al. A modification of time-driven activity-based costing for comparing cost of telehealth and in-person visits. Telemed J E Health [Internet. 2022;
5.
Muppavarapu K, Saeed SA, Jones K, Hurd O, Haley V. Study of Impact of Telehealth Use on Clinic “No Show” Rates at an Academic Practice. Psychiatric Quarterly. 2022;93(2):689–99.
6.
Hirshberg A, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. Text message remote monitoring reduced racial disparities in postpartum blood pressure ascertainment. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;221(3):283–5.
7.
Hoyert DL. Maternal mortality rates in the United States. 2020;
8.
Kozhimannil KB, Interrante JD, Henning-Smith C, Admon LK. Rural-urban differences in severe maternal morbidity and mortality in the U.S., 2007–15. Health Aff [Internet. 2019;
9.
sheet I. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech.
10.
Commission FC. Advancing broadband connectivity as a social determinant of health [Internet. 2023;
11.
Eyrich NW, Andino JJ, Fessell DP. Bridging the Digital Divide to Avoid Leaving the Most Vulnerable Behind. JAMA Surgery.
12.
Equity in telehealth: taking key steps forward [Internet. 2022;
13.
Digital Health Equity | AHA [Internet. American Hospital Association. 2023;
14.
Equity-Focused Clinical Guidance and Policies [Internet]. American College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians.
15.
2023;
16.
State Telehealth Policies for Cross-State Licensing [Internet]. The Center for Connected Health Policy. 2023;
17.
Demaerschalk BM, Cassivi SD, Blegen RN, Borah B, Moriarty J, Gullerud R, et al. Health economic analysis of postoperative video telemedicine visits to patients’ homes.
18.
VA Expands Telehealth by allowing health care providers to treat patients across state lines—VA. News [Internet. 2019;
19.
20.
Uptick in telehealth reveals medical malpractice concerns [Internet. Bloomberg Law. 2023;
21.
Rowland SP, Fitzgerald JE, Lungren M, Lee E, Harned Z, McGregor AH. Digital health technology-specific risks for medical malpractice liability. npj Digital Medicine. 5(1).
22.
Lamb T, Parker M. Cyber insurance—from risk transference to organizational insurance [Internet. Health and Human Services. 2021.
23.
2023;
24.
2023;
25.
Research P. National Conference of State Legislatures. 2023;
26.
Moving forward after the COVID-19 public health emergency | CMS [Internet]. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
27.
Martin J, Hamilton B, Osterman M, Driscoll A. Births: final data for 2019 [Internet]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021 Mar. Vols. 70, Number 2. 2023.
Musumeci M. Key questions about the new increase in federal medicaid matching funds for COVID-19 [Internet. KFF. 2020;
30.
Hinton E, Raphael J, Haldar S, Gifford K, Lashbrook A, Nardone M, et al. How the pandemic continues to shape medicaid priorities: results from an annual medicaid budget survey for state fiscal years 2022 and 2023—Telehealth—10030 [Internet. KFF. 2022;
31.
Telehealth policy changes after the COVID-19 public health emergency [Internet. TelehealthHHS.gov. 2023;
32.
Hubschman-Shahar LE. Lactation telehealth in primary care: a systematic review.
33.
How does health spending in the U.S. compare to other countries? 2023;
34.
U.S T. Maternal mortality crisis continues to worsen: an international comparison [Internet. The Commonwealth Fund. 2022;
35.
Four in 5 pregnancy-related deaths in the U.S. are preventable [Internet. CDC Newsroom. 2022;
36.
Office USGA. Maternal health: outcomes worsened and disparities persisted during the pandemic | U.S. GAO [Internet] Gao.gov. 2022;
37.
Nesbitt TS. The evolution of telehealth: where have we been and where are we going? [Internet]. The role of telehealth in an evolving health care environment: workshop summary.
38.
Gao C, Malin BA, Chen Y. Telehealth Uptake into Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 2022.
39.
DeNicola N, Grossman D, Marko K, Sonalkar S, Butler Tobah YS, Ganju N, et al. Telehealth Interventions to Improve Obstetric and Gynecologic Health Outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2020;135(2):371–82.
40.
Movitz S, Mayer R, Dingwall A. Incorporating equity into maternal telehealth. Georgetown Med Rev [Internet. 2022;
41.
Woo VG, Lundeen T, Matula S, Milstein A. Achieving higher-value obstetrical care. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;216(3):250.e1-250.e14.
42.
YS BT. OB Nest: a new vision for prenatal care—Mayo Clinic [Internet. 2021;
43.
Weigel G, Frederiksen B. Telemedicine and pregnancy care [Internet. KFF. 2020;
44.
Cantor A, Jungbauer R, Totten A, Tilden E, Holmes R, Ahmed A, et al. Telehealth strategies for the delivery of maternal health care. 2022.
45.
Hirshberg A, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. Text message remote monitoring reduced racial disparities in postpartum blood pressure ascertainment. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;221(3):283–5.
46.
Butler Tobah YS, LeBlanc A, Branda ME, Inselman JW, Morris MA, Ridgeway JL, et al. Randomized comparison of a reduced-visit prenatal care model enhanced with remote monitoring. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;221(6):638.e1-638.e8.
47.
White House Blueprint for addressing the maternal health crisis [Internet]. The White House: The Office of the President of the United States. 2022;
48.
Marcucci B. Use of Telehealth to Increase Breastfeeding Exclusivity and Duration. Clinical Lactation. 2018;9(2):66–71.
49.
Posmontier B, Neugebauer R, Stuart S, Chittams J, Shaughnessy R. Telephone‐Administered Interpersonal Psychotherapy by Nurse‐Midwives for Postpartum Depression. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2016;61(4):456–66.
50.
Becevic M, Boren S, Mutrux R, Shah Z, Banerjee S. User Satisfaction With Telehealth. The Health Care Manager. 2015;34(4):337–49.
51.
Pflugeisen BM, Mou J. Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Obstetric Care. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2017;21(7):1544–51.
52.
Nelson GA, Holschuh C. Evaluation of Telehealth Use in Prenatal Care for Patient and Provider Satisfaction: A Step Toward Reducing Barriers to Care. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 2021;17(4):481–4.
53.
Liu CH, Goyal D, Mittal L, Erdei C. Patient Satisfaction with Virtual-Based Prenatal Care: Implications after the COVID-19 Pandemic. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2021;25(11):1735–43.
54.
Wali R, Alhakami A, Alsafari N. Evaluating the level of patient satisfaction with telehealth antenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Primary Health Care Center, Specialized Polyclinic. Women’s Health. 2022;18.
55.
Barbour KD, Nelson R, Esplin MS, Varner M, Clark EAS. 873: A randomized trial of prenatal care using telemedicine for low-risk pregnancies: patient-related cost and time savings. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;216(1):S499.
56.
Smith VJ, Marshall A, Lie MLS, Bidmead E, Beckwith B, Van Oudgaarden E, et al. Implementation of a fetal ultrasound telemedicine service: women’s views and family costs. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2021;21(1).
57.
Shanafelt TD, West CP, Dyrbye LN, Trockel M, Tutty M, Wang H, et al. Changes in Burnout and Satisfaction With Work-Life Integration in Physicians During the First 2 Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2022;97(12):2248–58.
58.
Kingston AM. Break the silence: physician suicide in the time of COVID-19. Mo Med. 2020;117(5):426–9.
59.
deMayo R, Huang Y, Lin EJD, Lee JA, Heggland A, Im J, et al. Associations of Telehealth Care Delivery with Pediatric Health Care Provider Well-Being. Applied Clinical Informatics. 2022;13(01):230–41.
60.
Bunnell BE, Barrera JF, Paige SR, Turner D, Welch BM. Acceptability of Telemedicine Features to Promote Its Uptake in Practice: A Survey of Community Telemental Health Providers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(22):8525.
61.
Malouff TD, TerKonda SP, Knight D, Abu Dabrh AM, Perlman AI, Munipalli B, et al. Physician Satisfaction With Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mayo Clinic Florida Experience. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes. 2021;5(4):771–82.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
