×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Narrative/Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analysis

Telehealth for Equitable Obstetric Care: Addressing Gaps for Patients, Providers, and Payers

By
Sabrina Movitz, MS Orcid logo ,
Sabrina Movitz, MS
Contact Sabrina Movitz, MS

The MITRE Corporation , McLean, Virginia , United States

Rachel Mayer Ediger Orcid logo ,
Rachel Mayer Ediger

The MITRE Corporation , McLean, Virginia , United States

Alison Dingwall Orcid logo ,
Alison Dingwall

The MITRE Corporation , McLean, Virginia, , United States

Yvonne Butler Tobah Orcid logo
Yvonne Butler Tobah

The Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota , United States

Abstract

In June 2022, President Biden and Vice President Harris released their blueprint for addressing the maternal health crisis, stating their “vision for the future is that the United States will be considered the best country in the world to have a baby.” Currently, it is one of the worst among industrialized countries despite the US spending nearly double the average amount on healthcare per capita. The US is amidst a maternal mortality crisis, particularly for Black and American Indian/Alaska Native pregnant people, with more than 80% of the deaths preventable. Telehealth in obstetrics has the potential to reach pregnant people who are not currently being served by the medical system and to improve rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality; however, more research is needed to understand and monitor its equity, costs, and optimal usage. Extant research shows that telehealth can produce a small positive effect for certain obstetric health outcomes, but these research findings are rarely stratified by pregnant patients’ demographics. To prevent the perpetuation of existing health inequities, gaps in obstetric telehealth research will need to be addressed. Key knowledge gaps for researchers and policy makers include outcomes, access, satisfaction by patients and providers, potential time savings for patients, and health system cost savings. Im​plementation of equitable obstetric coverage of telehealth services requires clarity from private and public payers for inter-state provisions of care, liability and risk, and service and payment parity.

Note: While we use pregnant and postpartum people where possible here to recognize that not all pregnant people identify as women, we occasionally use maternal to reflect terminology used in federal, state, and local data.

References

1.
Map CS. Interstate Medical Licensure Compact. 2023;
2.
Thao V, Dholakia R, Kreofsky BL, Moriarty JP, Colby CE, Demaerschalk BM, et al. Modeling the cost of teleneonatology from the health system perspective. Telemed J E Health [Internet. 2022;
3.
Snoswell CL, Taylor ML, Comans TA, Smith AC, Gray LC, Caffery LJ. Determining if Telehealth Can Reduce Health System Costs: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(10):e17298.
4.
Dooley MJ, Simpson KN, Simpson AN, Nietert PJ, Williams JD, King K, et al. A modification of time-driven activity-based costing for comparing cost of telehealth and in-person visits. Telemed J E Health [Internet. 2022;
5.
Muppavarapu K, Saeed SA, Jones K, Hurd O, Haley V. Study of Impact of Telehealth Use on Clinic “No Show” Rates at an Academic Practice. Psychiatric Quarterly. 2022;93(2):689–99.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.