×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Editorial

Electronic Health Record Modernization: Nursing Excellence through Virtual Care

By
MARY KATE SWEENEY Orcid logo ,
MARY KATE SWEENEY
Contact MARY KATE SWEENEY

NESSU Outpatient Registered Nurse, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office (VACO) , Washington, DC , United States

Jenifer Dow Orcid logo ,
Jenifer Dow

NESSU Outpatient Registered Nurse, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office (VACO) United States

Vertina Dyson Orcid logo ,
Vertina Dyson

NESSU Outpatient Registered Nurse, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office (VACO) United States

Susan Keller Orcid logo ,
Susan Keller

NESSU Outpatient Registered Nurse, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office (VACO) , Washington, DC , United States

Andria Mingo Orcid logo ,
Andria Mingo

NESSU Outpatient Registered Nurse, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office (VACO) , Washington, DC , United States

Angela Quimby Orcid logo ,
Angela Quimby

NESSU Outpatient Registered Nurse, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office (VACO) , Washington, DC , United States

Annarika Seecharan Orcid logo ,
Annarika Seecharan

NESSU Outpatient Registered Nurse, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office (VACO) , Washington, DC , United States

Nicole Zimmerman Orcid logo
Nicole Zimmerman

NESSU Outpatient Licensed Practical Nurse, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office (VACO) , Washington, DC , United States

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is undergoing an Electronic Health Record Modernization (EHRM) across the entire enterprise, with the goal of creating a shared Federal Electronic Health Record (FEHR). In 2017, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) joined with the Department of Defense (DOD) to plan for the transition to a modernized, combined EHR platform to capture the healthcare delivery of both active-duty members and veterans. The VHA anticipated transitioning to the new EHR across all medical centers nationally over a period of 10 years—”the largest EHR transition in history.” The first rollout was in October 2020 in Spokane, Washington, USA.

References

1.
Atkins D, Clancy C, Elnahal S. Modernizing a National Electronic Health Record: a Learning Health Care System Approach. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2023;38(S4):934–6.
2.
Rizer M, Kaufman B, Sieck C, Hefner J, Mcalearney A. Top 10 lessons learned from electronic medical record implementation in a large academic medical center. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015;1–9.
3.
Ahlness EA, Orlander J, Brunner J, Cutrona SL, Kim B, Molloy-Paolillo BK, et al. “Everything’s so Role-Specific”: VA Employee Perspectives’ on Electronic Health Record (EHR) Transition Implications for Roles and Responsibilities. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2023;38(S4):991–8.
4.
Rinne ST, Brunner J, Mohr DC, Bearak AC, Anderson E. Practices Supporting Electronic Health Record Transitions: Lessons from Four US Healthcare Systems. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2023;38(S4):1015–22.
5.
Penny RA, Bradford NK, Langbecker D. Registered nurse and midwife experiences of using videoconferencing in practice: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2018;27(5–6).
6.
Laughlin C, Whitwer S. 2019;(4).
7.
Gholamzadeh M, Abtahi H, Ghazisaeeidi M. Applied techniques for putting pre-visit planning in clinical practice to empower patient-centered care in the pandemic era: a systematic review and framework suggestion. BMC Health Services Research. 2021;21(1).
8.
Huang C, Koppel R, McGreevey JD, Craven CK, Schreiber R. Transitions from One Electronic Health Record to Another: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Recommendations. Applied Clinical Informatics. 2020;11(05):742–54.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.