×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Original Clinical Research

Comparison of Virtual and In-Person Tobacco Treatment Specialist Training

By
James Davis, MD Orcid logo ,
James Davis, MD
Contact James Davis, MD

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke Smoking Cessation Program , Durham, North Carolina , United States

Sonia Clark, MHA Orcid logo ,
Sonia Clark, MHA

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke Smoking Cessation Program , Durham, North Carolina , United States

Jennifer Greyber Orcid logo ,
Jennifer Greyber

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke Smoking Cessation Program, Durham , North Carolina , United States

Jillian Dirkes, MSW, LCSW ,
Jillian Dirkes, MSW, LCSW

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke Smoking Cessation Program, Durham , North Carolina , United States

Sally Herndon, MPH ,
Sally Herndon, MPH

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke Smoking Cessation Program, Durham , North Carolina , United States

Joyce Swetlick, MPH ,
Joyce Swetlick, MPH

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke Smoking Cessation Program, Durham , North Carolina , United States

Susan Trout, LCSW, MSPH, NCTTP ,
Susan Trout, LCSW, MSPH, NCTTP

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke Smoking Cessation Program , Durham,North Carolina , United States

Farid Manshaii Orcid logo ,
Farid Manshaii

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke Smoking Cessation Program , Durham, North Carolina , United States

Adam Goldstein, MD, MPH Orcid logo
Adam Goldstein, MD, MPH

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke Smoking Cessation Program , Durham, North Carolina , United States

Abstract

Purpose: There is limited research comparing virtual and in-person tobacco treatment specialist training. As a result of COVID-19, the Duke-UNC Tobacco Treatment Specialist Training Program (Duke-UNC TTS) transitioned from an in-person to a virtual format, allowing for a comparison of these two training formats. Materials and Methods: We conducted an observational study comparing Duke-UNC TTS attendance and evaluations at three courses provided in-person in 2019 with the same three courses provided virtually in 2020.  Results: The transition from in-person to virtual format was associated with more than a doubling of course attendance (in-person format enrolled 112 participants; virtual format enrolled 232 participants; p < 0.05).  The virtual format was also associated with more than two times the proportion of out-of-state participant attendance (in-person format enrolled 22.3% out-of-state attendees; virtual format enrolled 52.8% out-of-state attendees; p < 0.05). Course evaluations showed similar quality scores for measuring perceived knowledge acquisition and course satisfaction. Conclusions: This observational study showed that the virtual TTS training format had higher attendance and wider geographical reach, without a significant loss in quality, than the in-person training format. The study suggests that TTS training programs should consider continued delivery of training through interactive virtual formats to increase accessibility for participants.

References

1.
Smoking cessation: a report of the Surgeon General [Internet. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020;
2.
Shiffman S, Brockwell SE, Pillitteri JL, Gitchell JG. Use of Smoking-Cessation Treatments in the United States. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008;34(2):102–11.
3.
Rojewski AM, Bailey SR, Bernstein SL, Cooperman NA, Gritz ER, Karam-Hage MA, et al. Considering Systemic Barriers to Treating Tobacco Use in Clinical Settings in the United States. Nicotine &amp; Tobacco Research. 2019;21(11):1453–61.
4.
Sheffer CE, Al-Zalabani A, Aubrey A, Bader R, Beltrez C, Bennett S, et al. The Emerging Global Tobacco Treatment Workforce: Characteristics of Tobacco Treatment Specialists Trained in Council-Accredited Training Programs from 2017 to 2019. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(5):2416.
5.
2022;
6.
Alqahtani AY, Rajkhan AA. E-Learning Critical Success Factors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Analysis of E-Learning Managerial Perspectives. Education Sciences. 10(9):216.
7.
Cook DA, Wilkinson JM, Foo J. Costs of Physician Continuous Professional Development: A Systematic Review. Academic Medicine. 2022;97(10):1554–63.
8.
Evans L, Vanden Bosch ML, Harrington S, Schoofs N, Coviak C. Flipping the Classroom in Health Care Higher Education. Nurse Educator. 2019;44(2):74–8.
9.
Brose LS, West R, Michie S, McEwen A. Changes in success rates of smoking cessation treatment associated with take up of a national evidencebased training programme. Preventive Medicine. 2014;69:1–4.
10.
Song F, Maskrey V, Blyth A, Brown TJ, Barton GR, Aveyard P, et al. Differences in Longer-Term Smoking Abstinence After Treatment by Specialist or Nonspecialist Advisors: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Relapse Prevention Trial. Nicotine &amp; Tobacco Research. 2016;18(5):1061–6.
11.
Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, Abdelwahed A, Al-Nusair L. Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):e042378.
12.
Wilson A, Guillaumier A, George J, Denham A, Bonevski B. A systematic narrative review of the effectiveness of behavioural smoking cessation interventions in selected disadvantaged groups (2010-2017). Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. 2017;11(8):617–30.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.