×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Articles

The Mobile Teleophthalmology Unit in Rural and Underserved Areas of South India

By
Sheila John Orcid logo ,
Sheila John
Lavanya Allimuthu ,
Lavanya Allimuthu
Ranjitha Kannan ,
Ranjitha Kannan
Ramesh BabuSekar ,
Ramesh BabuSekar
Martin Manoj Mathiyazahan Orcid logo ,
Martin Manoj Mathiyazahan
Padmavathy Appasamy ,
Padmavathy Appasamy
Sangeetha Srinivasan Orcid logo
Sangeetha Srinivasan

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to provide an eye care service to rural and underserved areas in Chennai, Kanchipuram, and Thiruvallur districts of Tamil Nadu, South India. Design: We conducted eye camps to provide ophthalmic services to the underserved and rural areas, where people cannot afford to go to a hospital due to lack of accessibility, lack of awareness, or financial constraints. Setting: The study was conducted in rural and underserved areas of Thiruvallur, Chennai, and Kanchipuram districts from January 2015 to December 2019. Participants: Patients (N = 1,05,827) underwent comprehensive eye examination in eye camps with the state-of-art ophthalmic equipment. Main outcome measures: To report on the number of patients examined, number of eye disorders screened, and different types of ocular pathology screened, all clinical findings were recorded and all ocular images were uploaded in the electronic medical records. All patients with ocular diseases underwent teleconsultation with an ophthalmologist at the base hospital with internet connectivity. Video conferencing and teleconsultation were feasible only in areas with good internet connectivity. Results: Over the 5-year study period, 1,05,827 patients underwent eye evaluation at 1,061 eye camps. Among these, 48,354 (45.7%) patients were males, 57,473 (54.3%) patients were females, 15,515 patients were emmetropes. The most common cause of avoidable blindness was uncorrected refractive error detected in 66,137 eyes, referable cataract was seen in 13,536 eyes, 2,491 eyes were identified to have retinal diseases, and there were 789 patients with only diabetic retinopathy, thus totaling to 3,280 comprising of all retinal disease. 2424 patients received teleconsultations. For further investigations and treatment, which were provided free of cost, patients were referred to the base hospital in Chennai. There were 6,309 patients who received free spectacles and an additional 31,192 patients received spectacles at a low cost; 13,536 patients had referable cataract and were referred to the base hospital for further evaluation and surgery. Conclusions: Teleophthalmology holds great potential to overcome barriers, improve quality, access, and affordability to eye care, and has proven to be an innovative means of taking comprehensive eye care facilities to the doorsteps of rural India.

References

1.
Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2011;96(5):614–8.
2.
Das T, Pappuru R. Telemedicine in diabetic retinopathy: Access to rural India. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2016;64(1):84.
3.
Ayatollahi H, Nourani A, Khodaveisi T, Aghaei H, Mohammadpour M. Teleophthalmology in Practice: Lessons Learned from a Pilot Project. The Open Medical Informatics Journal. 2017;11(1):20–8.
4.
John S, Sengupta S, Reddy SJ, Prabhu P, Kirubanandan K, Badrinath SS. The Sankara Nethralaya Mobile Teleophthalmology Model for Comprehensive Eye Care Delivery in Rural India. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2012;18(5):382–7.
5.
Prathiba V, Rema M. Teleophthalmology: A Model for Eye Care Delivery in Rural and Underserved Areas of India. International Journal of Family Medicine. 2011;2011:1–4.
6.
Ganapathy K, Ravindra A. Telemedicine in India: The Apollo Story. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2009;15(6):576–85.
7.
Zimmer-Galler IE, Kimura AE, Gupta S. Diabetic retinopathy screening and the use of telemedicine. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2015;26(3):167–72.
8.
Mansberger SL, Gleitsmann K, Gardiner S, Sheppler C, Demirel S, Wooten K, et al. Comparing the Effectiveness of Telemedicine and Traditional Surveillance in Providing Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Examinations: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2013;19(12):942–8.
9.
Maa AY, Patel S, Chasan JE, Delaune W, Lynch MG. Retrospective Evaluation of a Teleretinal Screening Program in Detecting Multiple Nondiabetic Eye Diseases. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2017;23(1):41–8.
10.
Qureshi B, Mansur R, Al-Rajhi A, Lansingh V, Eckert K, Hassan K, et al. Best practice eye care models. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2012;60(5):351.
11.
Kovai V, Rao G, Holden B. Key factors determining success of primary eye care through vision centres in rural India: Patients′ perspectives. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2012;60(5):487.
12.
Tan IJ, Dobson LP, Bartnik S, Muir J, Turner AW. Real-time teleophthalmology versus face-to-face consultation: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2016;23(7):629–38.
13.
Caffery LJ, Taylor M, Gole G, Smith AC. Models of care in tele-ophthalmology: A scoping review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2017;25(2):106–22.
14.
Paul PG, Raman R, Rani PK, Deshmukh H, Sharma T. Patient Satisfaction Levels During Teleophthalmology Consultation in Rural South India. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2006;12(5):571–8.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.