The Triple Aim is a framework developed to increase the value of healthcare through three interrelated components; improving the individual experience of care, improving the health of populations, and reducing the per capita cost of care for populations. Achieving the goals of the Triple Aim for everyone requires a fundamental change in how we deliver healthcare. A thoughtfully implemented home telehealth program has the potential to achieve these important endpoints for a large group of patients. However, its success is dependent upon numerous factors ranging from effective integration of technology and adoption to reimbursement policy.
Osborne T, Reich J, Arkwrite M, Russo, Jr J. On the digital road to home healthcare. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2016;
2.
Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The Triple Aim: Care, Health, And Cost. Health Affairs. 2008;27(3):759–69.
3.
Case J. A Primer on defining the Triple Aim.
4.
Accenture. Tech-savvy seniors want online options to access care from home, Accenture survey shows.
5.
Reich JJ, Osborne TF. Home Telehealth and The Triple Aim. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2018;1(4).
6.
Caregiver F, Alliance. Selected long-term care statistics. 2015;
7.
Viers BR, Pruthi S, Rivera ME, O’Neil DA, Gardner MR, Jenkins SM, et al. Are Patients Willing to Engage in Telemedicine for Their Care: A Survey of Preuse Perceptions and Acceptance of Remote Video Visits in a Urological Patient Population. Urology. 2015;85(6):1233–40.
8.
University of Chicago. Health IT and health disparities: Patient provider telehealth network-using telehealth to improve chronic disease management. 2012;
9.
Broderick A, Lindeman D. Case studies in telehealth adoption. 2013;
10.
Chau P, Hu P. Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Inform Manage. 2000;297–311.
11.
Murias G, Sales B, Garcia-Esquirol O, Blanch L. Telemedicine in Critical Care. The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal. 2009;3(1):10–6.
12.
Singh R, Mathiassen L, Stachura M, Astapova E. Dynamic capabilities in home health: IT-enabled transformation of post-acute care. JAMIA. 2011;163–88.
13.
Jimison H, Gorman P, Woods S. Barriers and drivers of health information technology use by the elderly chronically ill and underserved.
14.
Reich JJ, Osborne TF. Home Telehealth and The Triple Aim. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2018;1(4).
15.
Denesen B, Nonnecke B, Lindeman D. Personalized health in the future: A global research agenda. J Med Internet Res. 2016;(3):53.
16.
Ekeland A, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform. 2010;(11):736–71.
17.
Mushcab H, Kernohan W, Wallace J, Martin S. Web-based remote monitoring systems for self-managing type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;(7):498–509.
18.
Dahl D, Reisetter J, Zismann N. People, technology, and process meet the Triple Aim. Nurs Admin Q. 2014;(1):13–21.
19.
Maeng D, Starr A, Tomcavage J, Sciandra J, Salek D, Griffith D. Popul Health Manag. 2014;(6):340–4.
20.
Frakt AB, Mayes R. Beyond Capitation: How New Payment Experiments Seek To Find The ‘Sweet Spot’ In Amount Of Risk Providers And Payers Bear. Health Affairs. 2012;31(9):1951–8.
21.
Leff B, Carlson C, Saliba D, Ritchie C. The invisible homebound: Setting qualityof-care standards for home-bound primary and palliative care. Health Aff. 2014;(1):21–9.
22.
Nguyen OK, Makam AN, Clark C, Zhang S, Xie B, Velasco F, et al. Vital Signs Are Still Vital: Instability on Discharge and the Risk of Post-Discharge Adverse Outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2016;32(1):42–8.
23.
Silow-Carroll S, Edwards J, Lashbrook A. Reducing hospital readmissions: Lessons from top-performing hospitals. The Commonwealth Fund. 2011;
24.
Davis C, Bender M, Smith T, Broad J. Feasibility and acute care utilization outcomes of a post-acute transitional telemonitoring program for underserved chronic disease patients. Telemed J E Health. 2015;(9):705–13.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
