×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Narrative/Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analysis

Surmounting Barriers to Healthcare Data and Information: Cases in Point, the U.S. Experience

By
Bharath Perugu, MBA ,
Bharath Perugu, MBA
Varun Wadhwa, BS ,
Varun Wadhwa, BS
Jin Kim, ME ,
Jin Kim, ME
Jenny Cai, BS (Candidate) ,
Jenny Cai, BS (Candidate)
Audrey Shin, BS (Candidate) ,
Audrey Shin, BS (Candidate)
Amar Gupta, MBA/PhD
Amar Gupta, MBA/PhD

Abstract

Objective: The authors review the progress in healthcare interoperability from 2010 to 2023 in the United States. Interoperability, in the context of this paper, is “the ability to share information across time and space from multiple devices, sources, and organizations”, as defined by the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers). This is followed by recommendations for future work toward improving the standardization of heterogeneous data in the healthcare setting. Methodology: A literature review was conducted on established interoperability standards and systems in healthcare based on information obtained from journal publications, government, academy reports, published materials, as well as publicly available websites. Examples of specific interoperability efforts and an evaluation of their feasibility were conducted at three levels of healthcare interoperability, as defined by the National Academy of Medicine: 1) inter-facility (macro-tier) interoperability, 2) intra-facility (meso-tier) interoperability, and 3) Point-of-Care (micro-tier) interoperability. An evaluation of four interoperability parameters: 1) device/equipment interoperability, 2) compatibility issues, 3) involved organizations, and 4) migration and conversion issues are presented. The evaluation assessed the adoption levels of each standard by looking at factors that support or limit its systemic adoption. Estimations on the number of users—medical professionals and patients—for each system were made in instances where verifiable data were available. Results: This review reveals that… Conclusions: Despite many parallel ongoing efforts to improve the standardization of healthcare information, in the mobile devices, Internet of Things (IoT), and electronic health record (HER) sectors, there remains space for improvement. The recent development of the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA) greatly reduces the friction of data exchange in many healthcare contexts. In addition, funding architectures for mediating data between separate healthcare organizations, or middleware architectures, might also be an effective strategy for consolidating healthcare data and improving information exchange.

References

1.
Nist. 2008;
2.
Bell W. The American invasion of Grenada: a note on false prophecy. Foresight. 2008;10(3):27–42.
3.
Pronovost P. Procuring Interoperability: achieving high-quality, connected, and person-centered care. Learning Health System Series. 2018;1.
4.
Interoperability. composability, and their implications for distributed simulation: towards mathematical foundations of simulation interoperability. 2023;
5.
Haug P, Narus S, Bledsoe J, Stanley H. Promoting national and international standards to build interoperable clinical applications. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018;555–63.
6.
of the Actuary Releases 2021-2030 Projections of National Health Expenditures. 2023;
7.
Shrank WH, Rogstad TL, Parekh N. Waste in the US Health Care System. JAMA. 2019;322(15):1501.
8.
Reisman M. EHRs: The challenge of making electronic data usable and interoperable. 2017;(9):572–5.
9.
O’neill D, Scheinker D. Wasted health spending: who’s picking up the tab? Health Aff Forefr. 2023;
10.
11.
Get the facts about state health information exchange program. 2023;
12.
Kierkegaard P, Kaushal R, Vest J. Applications of Health information exchange information to public health practice. 2014;795–804.
13.
Yeager VA, Vest JR, Walker DM, Diana ML, Menachemi N. Challenges to Conducting Health Information Exchange Research and Evaluation:            Reflections and Recommendations for Examining the Value of HIE. eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes). 2017;5(1):15.
14.
Indiana Health Information Exchange-your healthcare records matter [Internet]. Indiana Health Information Exchange. 2023;
15.
Healthcare exchange standards: health information exchange: centralized, federated, or distributed. 2023;
16.
Overview: Indiana Health Information Exchange. 2023;
17.
Bernstam EV, Applegate RJ, Yu A, Chaudhari D, Liu T, Coda A, et al. Real-World Matching Performance of Deidentified Record-Linking Tokens. Applied Clinical Informatics. 2022;13(04):865–73.
18.
Khan WA, Khattak AM, Hussain M, Amin MB, Afzal M, Nugent C, et al. An Adaptive Semantic based Mediation System for Data Interoperability among Health Information Systems. Journal of Medical Systems. 2014;38(8).
19.
Ali S, Chong I. Semantic Mediation Model to Promote Improved Data Sharing Using Representation Learning in Heterogeneous Healthcare Service Environments. Applied Sciences. 2019;9(19):4175.
20.
Fhir, Ontology. 2023;
21.
Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA) | HealthIT.gov [Internet]. 2023;

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.