×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Use Cases, Pilots

Standardizing Competencies and Enhancing Professionalism Through a Telepresenter Certificate Program

By
Rita Kobb Orcid logo ,
Rita Kobb

Department of Veterans Affairs, National Lead for Training and Outreach; Quality, Training, and Knowledge Management, Office of Connected Care, Veterans Health Administration, , Washington, DC , United States

Guercie Jean-Baptiste Orcid logo ,
Guercie Jean-Baptiste

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Manager, Quality, Training, and Knowledge Management, Office of Connected Care, Veterans Health Administration, , Washington, DC , United States

Harold Bonds Orcid logo ,
Harold Bonds

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Management and Program Analyst, Quality, Training, and Knowledge Management, Office of Connected Care, Veterans Health Administration , Washington, DC , United States

Rene Love Orcid logo ,
Rene Love

College of Nursing, University of Florida Health , Gainesville , United States

Catrell Maurice Harris Orcid logo ,
Catrell Maurice Harris
Contact Catrell Maurice Harris

Vice President Health Technology, Reingold, Inc, American Public University System Upper Marlboro , Maryland , United States

Tanya Morgan Orcid logo
Tanya Morgan

Raleigh-Durham , North Carolina , United States

Abstract

Background: Telehealth researchers frequently identify barriers to telehealth delivery, but often their literature does not propose change management strategies to improve access to care through telehealth. Systematic reviews support findings that education and training are lacking to ensure high-quality telehealth delivery. Curriculum that addresses technical skills, provides a clinical perspective for addressing digital health care, and proposes best practices can build the foundation for a competent telehealth workforce — most crucially, telepresenters. Objective: Recognizing an unmet need for standardized training for telepresenting health care professionals, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs’ Office of Connected Care (VA OCC) built on its prior telehealth experience to create a Telepresenter Certificate Program (TCP) in partnership with the University of Florida College of Nursing (UF CON). This paper describes the program’s curriculum, the educational methods used, and learners’ responses to a summative survey that evaluated the TCP’s impact. Methods: VA OCC and UF CON created a curriculum encompassing two courses. The first course was an introduction to the current knowledge regarding digital health, including the role of clinical informatics, electronic health records, patient-generated health data, and trends in data use in health care. The second course helped learners understand required telehealth competencies through patient case scenarios and covered topics such as how to telepresent virtual medical exams and apply these skills in practice. Results: Over a total of four TCP cohorts, 909 learners completed the program. Among overall learners, 87% agreed or strongly agreed that “they will be able to apply the knowledge and skills learned to effectively assist telehealth providers in delivering patient care using telehealth technology.” On average, 94% of TCP completers were satisfied with the program. Discussion: VA OCC’s partnership with UF CON successfully created a novel curriculum to standardize competencies and enhance professionalism for the telepresenter role through the TCP. Learners positively endorsed their acquisition of skills and their satisfaction with the program. The TCP offers a viable model for other health care consortiums to standardize competencies and enhance professionalism for telepresenters, resulting in improved telehealth quality and increased health care access.

References

1.
Shaver J. The State of Telehealth Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice. 2022;49(4):517–30.
2.
Mayer RE. Using multimedia for e‐learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2017;33(5):403–23.
3.
Musonda I, Okoro CS. A hermeneutic research on project management approaches applied in a business process re-engineering project. Business Process Management Journal. 2022;28(8):66–89.
4.
WHITTINGTON JW, NOLAN K, LEWIS N, TORRES T. Pursuing the Triple Aim: The First 7 Years. The Milbank Quarterly. 2015;93(2):263–300.
5.
Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The Triple Aim: Care, Health, And Cost. Health Affairs. 2008;27(3):759–69.
6.
Jidkov L, Alexander M, Bark P, Williams JG, Kay J, Taylor P, et al. Health informatics competencies in postgraduate medical education and training in the UK: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e025460.
7.
Banbury A, Taylor ML, Gray LC, Reid N, Smith AC. Sustaining and expanding telehealth activity: Training requirements for Australian residential aged care front-line staff. PEC Innovation. 2023;2:100109.
8.
Anil K, Bird AR, Bridgman K, Erickson S, Freeman J, McKinstry C, et al. Telehealth competencies for allied health professionals: A scoping review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.
9.
Kirkpatrick Partners LLC. Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation.
10.
Seels B, Glasgow Z. *Making instructional design decisions*. 1998.
11.
Reiser RA, Dempsey JV. *Trends and issues in instructional design and technology*. 2012.
12.
Interservice procedures for instructional systems development: Executive summary and model.
13.
New Approaches and Trends in the Philosophy of Educational Technology for Learning and Teaching Environments. European Journal of Contemporary Education. 6(3).
14.
Seel NM, Lehmann T, Blumschein P, Podolskiy OA. Chapter 1: What is instructional design? In: *Instructional design for learning: Theoretical foundations*. 2017. p. 6.
15.
Deniz ME, Satici SA, Doenyas C, Griffiths MD. Zoom Fatigue, Psychological Distress, Life Satisfaction, and Academic Well-Being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2022;25(5):270–7.
16.
Administration VH. *Veterans Health Administration*.
17.
Pearl R, Wayling B. The telehealth era is just beginning. *Harvard Business Review*. 2022;
18.
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. 2024;
19.
Shoemaker HE, Thorpe A, Stevens V, Butler JM, Drews FA, Burpo N, et al. Telehealth Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Veterans and Nonveterans: Web-Based Survey Study. JMIR Formative Research. 7:e42217.
20.
Heyworth L, Krish S, Zulman D, Ferguson JM, Kizer KW. Expanding access through virtual care: The VA’s early experience with COVID-19. In: *NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery*. 2020.
21.
Ferguson JM, Wray CM, Van Campen J, Zulman DM. A New Equilibrium for Telemedicine: Prevalence of In-Person, Video-Based, and Telephone-Based Care in the Veterans Health Administration, 2019–2023. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2024;177(2):262–4.
22.
Buck C, Kobb R, Sandreth R, Alexander L, Olliff S, Anderson C, et al. Maximizing VA Remote Patient Monitoring During the COVID-19 Response. Telehealth and Medicine Today.
23.
Thomas EE, Haydon HM, Mehrotra A, Caffery LJ, Snoswell CL, Banbury A, et al. Building on the momentum: Sustaining telehealth beyond COVID-19. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2022;28(4):301–8.
24.
Kho J, Gillespie N, Martin-Khan M. A systematic scoping review of change management practices used for telemedicine service implementations. BMC Health Services Research. 2020;20(1).
25.
Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2018;24(1):4–12.
26.
Rories K. Object 51: VA telehealth cart. *History of VA in 100 Objects*. 2023;
27.
Doraiswamy S, Abraham A, Mamtani R, Cheema S. Use of Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(12):e24087.
28.
Bate NJ, Xu SC, Pacilli M, Roberts LJ, Kimber C, Nataraja RM. Effect of the <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 induced phase of massive telehealth uptake on <scp>end‐user</scp> satisfaction. Internal Medicine Journal. 2021;51(2):206–14.
29.
Virtual care integration: Expanding options for Veterans to access care. 2024;
30.
Wang ZJ, Pavan D, Cynthia P, Larsen M, Schimpf M, Pearman G. Survey of veteran enrollees’ health and use of health care data findings report. 2021;

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.