Objectives: Like other areas of care affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth (both audio and video) was rapidly adopted in the obstetric setting. We performed a retrospective analysis of electronic health record (EHR) data to characterize the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with telehealth utilization among patients who received prenatal care. Materials and Methods: The study period covered March 23rd, 2020 to July 2nd, 2020, during which time 2,521 patients received prenatal care at a large academic medical center. We applied a generalized logistic regression to measure the relationship between the patients’ sociodemographic factors (in terms of age, race, ethnicity, urbanization level, and insurance type), pregnancy complications (namely, type 2 diabetes, chronic hypertension, and fetal growth restriction), and telehealth usage, as documented in the EHR. Results: During the study period, 2,521 patients had 16,516 prenatal care visits. 938 (37.2%) of the patients participated in at least one of 1,934 virtual prenatal care visits. Prenatal visits were more likely to be conducted through telehealth for patients who were older than 25 years old and lived in rural areas. In addition, patients who were with type 2 diabetes were more likely to use telehealth in their prenatal care (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 7.247 [95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 4.244 – 12.933]). By contrast, patients from racial and ethnic minority groups were less likely to have a telehealth encounter compared to white or non-Hispanic patients (aOR 0.603 [95% CI 0.465 – 0.778] and aOR 0.663 [95% CI 0.471 – 0.927], respectively). Additionally, patients who were on state-level Medicaid were less likely to use telehealth (aOR 0.495 [95% CI 0.402 – 0.608]). Discussion: Disparities in telehealth use for prenatal care suggest further investigations into access barriers. Hispanic patients who had low English language proficiency may not willing to see doctors via virtual care. Availability of high-speed internet and/or hardware may hold these patients who were insured through state-level Medicaid back due to poverty. Future work is advised to minimize access barriers to telehealth in its implementation. Conclusions: While telehealth expanded prenatal care access for childbearing women during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study suggested that there were non-trivial differences in the demographics of patients who utilized such settings.
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA).
2.
Lurie N, Carr BG. The Role of Telehealth in the Medical Response to Disasters. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2018;178(6):745.
3.
Der-Martirosian C, Chu K, Dobalian A. Use of Telehealth to Improve Access to Care at the United States Department of Veterans Affairs During the 2017 Atlantic Hurricane Season. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2020;17.
4.
Der-Martirosian C, Heyworth L, Chu K, Mudoh Y, Dobalian A. Patient Characteristics of VA Telehealth Users During Hurricane Harvey. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health. 2020;11.
5.
Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus. 2019;2.
6.
Gao C, Osmundson S, Malin B, Chen Y. Prenatal Telehealth During the Pandemic: Sociodemographic and Clinical Associations. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2021;
7.
Situation summary. 5AD;
8.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion Number 798. Implementing telehealth in practice. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Telehealth. 5AD;(2):73–9.
9.
Wilson JAB, Schild S. Provision of mental health care services to deaf individuals using telehealth. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2014;45(5):324–31.
10.
Fryer K, Delgado A, Foti T, Reid CN, Marshall J. Implementation of Obstetric Telehealth During COVID-19 and Beyond. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2020;24(9):1104–10.
11.
Zork NM, Aubey J, Yates H. Conversion and optimization of telehealth in obstetric care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Seminars in Perinatology. 2020;44(6):151300.
12.
Krenitsky NM, Spiegelman J, Sutton D, Syeda S, Moroz L. Primed for a pandemic: Implementation of telehealth outpatient monitoring for women with mild COVID-19. Seminars in Perinatology. 2020;44(7):151285.
13.
Madden N, Emeruwa UN, Friedman AM, Aubey JJ, Aziz A, Baptiste CD, et al. Telehealth Uptake into Prenatal Care and Provider Attitudes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis. American Journal of Perinatology. 2020;37(10):1005–14.
14.
Aziz A, Zork N, Aubey JJ, Baptiste CD, D’Alton ME, Emeruwa UN, et al. Telehealth for High-Risk Pregnancies in the Setting of the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journal of Perinatology. 2020;37(08):800–8.
15.
Nouri S, Khoong E, Lyles C, Karliner L. Addressing equity in telemedicine for chronic disease management during the Covid-19 pandemic. NEJM Catalyst. 2020;
16.
Bakhtiar M, Elbuluk N, Lipoff JB. The digital divide: How COVID-19’s telemedicine expansion could exacerbate disparities. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2020;83(5):e345–6.
17.
Ramsetty A, Adams C. Impact of the digital divide in the age of COVID-19. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2020;27(7):1147–8.
18.
Ferguson JM, Jacobs J, Yefimova M, Greene L, Heyworth L, Zulman DM. Virtual care expansion in the Veterans Health Administration during the COVID-19 pandemic: clinical services and patient characteristics associated with utilization. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2020;28(3):453–62.
19.
Kidshealth N. What’s a ’high-risk. 2018;
20.
Rodriguez JA, Saadi A, Schwamm LH, Bates DW, Samal L. Disparities In Telehealth Use Among California Patients With Limited English Proficiency. Health Affairs. 2021;40(3):487–95.
21.
Centers For Medicare M, Services, Medicaid. Telemedicine.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
