Rehabilitation is a major component of health sciences, and is the process of restoring an incapacitated individual to a normal life through training and therapy. Globally, 2.4 billion people may currently require rehabilitation. In 60 to 70% of countries, existing rehabilitation services have been disrupted due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Even after lockdowns and with vaccinations, some form of physical distancing is likely to be part of the new normal. Concurrently, there is an exponential growth of telehealth. This global overview will demonstrate that telerehabilitation (TR) is likely to be a distinct stand-alone sub-specialty of telehealth. Details of setting up TR, methods, and components are discussed, and clinical indications, limitations, advantages, disadvantages, challenges, and barriers to implementation and technological advances in TR are highlighted followed by an in-depth study of the literature from India.
Ganapathy K. Telemedicine in India: Personal Reminiscences from 1996. Tamilnadu Chapter of Telemedicine Society of India e-Newsletter Sep Issue. 2020;
2.
Ganapathy K. Official website. 2021;
3.
Ganapathy K, Aditi R. Healthcare for rural India: Is telemedicine the solution? J eHealth Technol Applic. 2007;203–7.
4.
Ganapathy K. Telehealth for one sixth of humankind making it happen: The Apollo Story. 2015;128–33.
5.
Ganapathy K, Interview. Eur Med J. 2020;
6.
Ganapathy K, Nukala L, Premanand S, Tamilmaran P, Aggarwal P, Saksena S, et al. Telemedicine in Camp Mode While Screening for Noncommunicable Diseases: A Preliminary Report from India. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2020;26(1):42–50.
7.
Ganapathy K, Kanwar V, Bhatnagar T, Uthayakumaran N. m-Health: A Critical Analysis of Awareness, Perception, and Attitude of Healthcare Among Providers in Himachal Pradesh, North India. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2016;22(8):675–88.
8.
Xixi L, Rai A, Ganapathy K. Designing cost-effective telemedicine camps for underprivileged individuals in less developed countries: A decomposed affordanceeffectivity framework. J Assoc Inform Sys. 2020;
9.
Ganapathy K. Deployment of Telemedicine in Neurosciences: The good and the evil—A balanced approach. Neurology India. 2018;66(6):1852.
10.
Ganapathy K. Telemedicine and neurosciences. Neurology India. 2018;66(3):642.
11.
Ganapathy K. Distribution of neurologists and neurosurgeons in India and its relevance to the adoption of telemedicine. Neurology India. 2015;63(2):142.
12.
Ganapathy K. Telemedicine and neurosciences in developing countries. Surgical Neurology. 2002;58(6):388–94.
13.
Ganapathy K. Telemedicine and neurosciences. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2005;12(8):851–62.
14.
Haranath SP, Ganapathy K, Kesavarapu SR, Kuragayala SD. eNeuroIntensive Care in India. Neurology India. 2021;69(2):245–51.
15.
Ganapathy K. Telemedicine. Neurology India. 2021;69(2):352–3.
16.
Ganapathy K, Chawdhry V, Premanand S, Sarma A, Chandralekha J, Kumar KY, et al. Telemedicine in the Himalayas: Operational Challenges—A Preliminary Report. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2016;22(10):821–35.
17.
Ganapathy K, Das S, Reddy S, Thaploo V, Nazneen A, Kosuru A, et al. Digital Health Care in Public Private Partnership Mode. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2021;27(12):1363–71.
18.
Ganapathy K, Alagappan D, Rajakumar H, Dhanapal B, Rama Subbu G, Nukala L, et al. Tele-Emergency Services in the Himalayas. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2019;25(5):380–90.
19.
Ganapathy K. Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare Regulatory and Legal Concerns. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2021;
20.
Ganapathy K. Space Medicine: The Ultimate in Remote Healthcare. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2020;5.
21.
Ganapathy K. Extra-terrestrial neurosciences. Neurology India. 2019;67(8):165.
22.
Ganapathy K. Telemedicine and Neurological Practice in the COVID-19 Era. Neurology India. 2020;68(3):555.
23.
Ganapathy K. Telemedicine and COVID-19. Apollo Medicine. 2020;17(3):205–8.
24.
Ganapathy K. Telegenomics: Relevance in India. Apollo Medicine. 2021;18(2):122–6.
25.
Ganapathy K. Telerehabilitation: The time has come. Keynote address. Indian Association of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 27AD;
26.
Brennan D, Tindall L, Theodoros D, Brown J, Campbell M, Christiana D, et al. A Blueprint for Telerehabilitation Guidelines. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 2010;31–4.
27.
Tenforde AS, Borgstrom H, Polich G, Steere H, Davis IS, Cotton K, et al. Outpatient Physical, Occupational, and Speech Therapy Synchronous Telemedicine. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2020;99(11):977–81.
28.
Richmond T, Peterson C, Cason J, Billings M, Terrell EA, Lee ACW, et al. American Telemedicine Association’s Principles for Delivering Telerehabilitation Services. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 2017;9(2):63–8.
29.
Market research report on the global telerehabilitation market size, share and Covid-19 impact analysis and regional forecast. 2020;2020–7.
30.
Telerehabilitation Market Size 2021. 2021;
31.
Jansen-Kosterink S, Dekker-van Weering M, van Velsen L. Patient acceptance of a telemedicine service for rehabilitation care: A focus group study. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2019;125:22–9.
32.
Dogru-Huzmeli E, Duman T, Cakmak AI, Aksay U. Can diplopia complaint be reduced by telerehabilitation in multiple sclerosis patient during the pandemic?: A case report. Neurological Sciences. 2021;42(10):4387–90.
33.
Neo JH, Teo ST, Lee CL, Cai CC. Telerehabilitation In The Treatment Of Frozen Shoulder: A Case Report. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 2019;11(2):3–8.
34.
Pastora-Bernal JM, Martín-Valero R, Barón-López FJ, Estebanez-Pérez MJ. Evidence of Benefit of Telerehabitation After Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2017;19(4):e142.
35.
Sobierajska-Rek A, Mański Ł, Jabłońska-Brudło J, Śledzińska K, Ucińska A, Wierzba J. Establishing a telerehabilitation program for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the COVID-19 pandemic. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021;344–50.
36.
Baadjou V, Hollander M, Meulenbroek T, Verbunt J, Timmers I. Clinicians´ initial experiences of transition to online interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine – Clinical Communications. 2020;3(1):1000036.
37.
Bhuva S, Lankford C, Patel N, Haddas R. Implementation and Patient Satisfaction of Telemedicine in Spine Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Patients During the COVID-19 Shutdown. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2020;99(12):1079–85.
38.
Klaic M, Galea MP. Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Identify Factors That Predict Likelihood to Adopt Tele-Neurorehabilitation. Frontiers in Neurology. 2020;11.
39.
Gately ME, Trudeau SA, Moo LR. In-Home Video Telehealth for Dementia Management: Implications for Rehabilitation. Current Geriatrics Reports. 2019;8(3):239–49.
40.
Grona SL, Bath B, Busch A, Rotter T, Trask C, Harrison E. Use of videoconferencing for physical therapy in people with musculoskeletal conditions: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2017;24(5):341–55.
41.
Mani S, Sharma S, Omar B, Paungmali A, Joseph L. Validity and reliability of Internet-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2016;23(3):379–91.
42.
Kilova K, Kitova T, Kasnakova P. Telemedicine in help of rehabilitation in the conditions of COVID-19. Health Policy and Technology. 2021;10(2):100508.
43.
Laver KE, Adey-Wakeling Z, Crotty M, Lannin NA, George S, Sherrington C. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020;2020(1).
44.
Tchero H, Tabue Teguo M, Lannuzel A, Rusch E. Telerehabilitation for Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2018;20(10):e10867.
45.
Cramer SC, Dodakian L, Le V, See J, Augsburger R, McKenzie A, et al. Efficacy of Home-Based Telerehabilitation vs In-Clinic Therapy for Adults After Stroke. JAMA Neurology. 2019;76(9):1079.
46.
Bashir A. Stroke and Telerehabilitation: A Brief Communication. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies. 2020;7(2):e18919.
47.
Jácome C, Marques A, Oliveira A, Rodrigues LV, Sanches I. Pulmonary telerehabilitation: An international call for action. Pulmonology. 2020;26(6):335–7.
48.
Almojaibel A, Munk N, Goodfellow L, Fisher T, Miller K, Comer A. Health Care practitioners’ determinants of telerehabilitation acceptance. Int J Telerehabil. 2020;43–50.
49.
Peretti A, Amenta F, Tayebati SK, Nittari G, Mahdi SS. Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies. 2017;4(2):e7.
50.
Perlman AL, Witthawaskul W. Real-Time Remote Telefluoroscopic Assessment of Patients with Dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):162–7.
51.
Rabatin AE, Lynch ME, Severson MC, Brandenburg JE, Driscoll SW. Pediatric telerehabilitation medicine: Making your virtual visits efficient, effective and fun. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine. 2020;13(3):355–70.
52.
Alexander M. It’s Corona Calling: Time for Telerehabilitation! Journal of Frailty, Sarcopenia and Falls. 2020;05(04):86–8.
53.
Aloyuni S, Alharbi R, Kashoo F, Alqahtani M, Alanazi A, Alzhrani M, et al. Knowledge, Attitude, and Barriers to Telerehabilitation-Based Physical Therapy Practice in Saudi Arabia. Healthcare. 2020;8(4):460.
54.
van Egmond MA, van der Schaaf M, Vredeveld T, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Klinkenbijl JHG, et al. Effectiveness of physiotherapy with telerehabilitation in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2018;104(3):277–98.
55.
W Miller T. Smart Advances in Healthcare for Geriatric Patients. American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research. 2019;1(3):130–1.
56.
India’s ageing population to reach 300 million by 2050 and raising demand for better services for seniors. 2018;
57.
Iamai. 2019;
58.
Techinsight. million Smartphone users, it’s time for Smartphone brands to turn towards services in 2020. 2020;
59.
2021;
60.
Jachak SP, Phansopkar PA, Naqvi WM, Kumar K. Great Awakening – Telerehabilitation in Physiotherapy during Pandemic and Impact of COVID-19. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2020;9(45):3387–93.
61.
Shenoy M, Shenoy P. Identifying the challenges and cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation: A narrative review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2021;1–4.
62.
Ateeq A, Jahan N, Alam M, Khanum F. Role of telerehabilitation in musculoskeletal conditions during COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Pain. 2020;217–8.
63.
Jayarajan D, Sivakumar T, Torous JB, Thirthalli J. Telerehabilitation in Psychiatry. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2020;42(5_suppl):57S-62S.
64.
2020;
65.
Senjam SS, Manna S, Vashist P, Gupta V, Varughese S, Tandon R. Tele-rehabilitation for visually challenged students during COVID-19 pandemic. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021;69(3):722–8.
66.
Christy B, Keeffe J. Telerehabilitation during COVID-19: Experiences in service delivery from South India. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2020;68(7):1489.
67.
Khanna M, Gowda GS, Bagevadi VI, Gupta A, Kulkarni K, Shyam RPS, et al. Feasibility and Utility of Tele-Neurorehabilitation Service in India: Experience from a Quaternary Center. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. 2018;09(04):541–4.
68.
Krishnan G. Telerehabilitation: An Overview. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2021;
69.
Narekuli A, Raja K, Pandve HT. Telerehabilitation in India: Points to Ponder. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal. 2019;13(3):18.
70.
Chandrasekaran B, Bairapareddy K, Agarwal U. Telerehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: An underrecognized management in tertiary care. Indian Journal of Palliative Care. 2018;24(4):529.
71.
Dhamija R, Garg D. Teleneurorehabilitation for Parkinson’s Disease: A Panacea for the Times to Come? Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. 2020;23(5):592.
72.
Nishu T, Ruby A, Jitendra P. Telerehabilitation as an adjunct service for geri care: Reaching the unreached. Int J Sci Res. 2015;332–4.
73.
R Vrinda. Telerehabilitation in the Field of Speech Language Pathology During Pandemic Covid19 Outbreak-an Analysis in Kerala. Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications. 2020;13(4):2281–8.
74.
Goswami S, Bhutada A, Jayachandran K. Telepractice in a person with aphasia. J All India Inst Speech Hearing (JAIISH). 2012;159–67.
75.
Mohan HS, Anjum A, Rao PKS. A Survey of Telepractice in Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology in India. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 2017;9(2):69–80.
76.
S. Rao P, Yashaswini R. Telepractice in speech-language pathology and audiology: Prospects and challenges. Journal of Indian Speech Language & Hearing Association. 2018;32(2):67.
77.
Sheetal M, Preeti M, Rekha K, et al. Telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research. 2021;9(1):3765–72.
78.
Drishti The Vision Foundation. 2020;
79.
Leochico CFD, Espiritu AI, Ignacio SD, Mojica JAP. Challenges to the Emergence of Telerehabilitation in a Developing Country: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Neurology. 2020;11.
80.
Maresca G, Maggio MG, De Luca R, Manuli A, Tonin P, Pignolo L, et al. Tele-Neuro-Rehabilitation in Italy: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Frontiers in Neurology. 2020;11.
81.
Qureshi AZ, Ullah S, Aldajani AA, Basson P, AlHabter AM, Ali T, et al. Telerehabilitation Guidelines in Saudi Arabia. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2021;27(10):1087–98.
82.
Wikipedia. Telerehabilitation. 2021;
83.
Mbada C, Baderinwa T, Sanuade C, Adekola A, Fatoye B, Maikudi C, et al. Awareness, attitude and expectations of physiotherapy students on telerehabilitation. Med Sci Educ. 2021;1–10.
84.
Prvu Bettger J, Resnik LJ. Telerehabilitation in the Age of COVID-19: An Opportunity for Learning Health System Research. Physical Therapy. 2020;100(11):1913–6.
85.
Choukou A. How the COVID-19 pandemic breaks new ground for in-home telerehabilitation. Active Assisted Living (AAL) Programme, University of Manitoba. 2021;
86.
Dycare. How to choose the best telerehabilitation platform: 7 key points. 2021;
87.
Krishnan G. Telerehabilitation: An Overview. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2021;
88.
Oliver M, Teruel MA, Molina JP, Romero-Ayuso D, González P. Ambient Intelligence Environment for Home Cognitive Telerehabilitation. Sensors. 2018;18(11):3671.
89.
Nuara A, Fabbri-Destro M, Scalona E, Lenzi SE, Rizzolatti G, Avanzini P. Telerehabilitation in response to constrained physical distance: an opportunity to rethink neurorehabilitative routines. Journal of Neurology. 2021;269(2):627–38.
90.
Krasovsky T, Lubetzky AV, Archambault PS, Wright WG. Will virtual rehabilitation replace clinicians: a contemporary debate about technological versus human obsolescence. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2020;17(1).
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
