×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Original Research

Maternal Deaths During a Pilot Study Using Digitized Maternal Early Warning System

By
Narmadha Kuppuswami ,
Narmadha Kuppuswami
Suresh Subramanian ,
Suresh Subramanian
Radharani Ravichandran
Radharani Ravichandran

Abstract

Background: India accounts for nearly one in six maternal deaths and over the last two decades, maternal mortality in India has decreased rapidly and faster than the global rate. However, the rate of decline has been slowing and further progress calls for new interventions and improvements in existing programs and the care-delivery process. Objective(s): We developed and tested a telehealth solution that included an early warning system and a clinical decision support tool for timely detection of clinical deterioration and appropriate management of women in labor at a large general hospital in India. The pilot study with 15,184 patients was associated with a significant decrease in maternal mortality and in-hospital eclampsia. The results were published earlier this year. Here we examine and analyze the maternal deaths that occurred during that study period and discuss reasons why preventable deaths occurred despite the telehealth early warning system and recommend possible approaches to further reduce the maternal mortality rate. Study Design: We carefully reviewed medical records of all maternal deaths during the two-year pilot from admission until death or transfer of these patients to a tertiary care center. We deconstructed the events leading to the adverse outcome and evaluated each based on the three delay modules for maternal deaths, namely seeking care, reaching the facility, and receiving care after reaching the facility. Results: Twelve maternal deaths occurred during the period of the study, six deaths occurred at the study sites and six deaths occurred after transport to a tertiary institution. Nine deaths were determined to be preventable. In five cases although multiple alerts were created indicating a clinical deterioration of the patients’ condition, lack of adequate knowledge and insufficient training on the part of the staff contributed to delays in initiating treatment and/or delays in timely transport. In all cases where the deaths occurred after the patient was transported, the warning system had identified the acute risk appropriately prior to the initiation of the transport. Considering all cases, the telehealth early warning system generated red alerts in every case, indicating an acute emergency (66.7%) and/or yellow alerts requiring continued observation (33.3%). Conclusion(s): Telehealth solutions incorporating early warning capability for identifying clinical deterioration among patients can play a crucial role in resource-constrained settings.  Telehealth early warning systems have the potential to accelerate the care-delivery process and expose gaps in an organization’s operating procedures as well as in the knowledge base of providers. Successful implementation of such telehealth systems requires strong referral networks and appropriate protocols to take advantage of the system’s early warning capabilities. In addition, it may be necessary that the early warning system be implemented in all referring and receiving institution within the system to ensure no fallout in patient care.

References

1.
Unfpa W, Health Organization U, Bank Group W. The United Nations Population Division. Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. 2019;
2.
Kanwal S. Modeled estimate maternal mortality ratio India. 2000;
3.
2022;
4.
Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context. Social Science & Medicine. 1994;38(8):1091–110.
5.
Rööst M, Altamirano V, Liljestrand J, Essén B. Priorities in emergency obstetric care in Bolivia––maternal mortality and near‐miss morbidity in metropolitan La Paz. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2009;116(9):1210–7.
6.
Samant PY, Dhanawat J. Maternal near miss: an Indian tertiary care centre audit. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;8(5):1874.
7.
Pacagnella RC, Cecatti JG, Parpinelli MA, Sousa MH, Haddad SM, Costa ML, et al. Delays in receiving obstetric care and poor maternal outcomes: results from a national multicentre cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14(1).
8.
Main EK, McCain CL, Morton CH, Holtby S, Lawton ES. Pregnancy-Related Mortality in California. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2015;125(4):938–47.
9.
Woiski M, de Visser S, van Vugt H, Dijkman A, Schuitemaker N, van Meir C, et al. Evaluating Adherence to Guideline-Based Quality Indicators for Postpartum Hemorrhage Care in the Netherlands Using Video Analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018;132(3):656–67.
10.
Kuppuswami N, Subramanian S, Groff KJ, Ravichandran RR. Digitized Maternal Early Warning and Response Telehealth System. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2021;
11.
Petersen E, Davis N, Goodman D, Cox S, Mayes M, N, et al. Vital signs: pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011-2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013-2017. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). 2019;(18):423–9.
12.
Semrau KEA, Hirschhorn LR, Marx Delaney M, Singh VP, Saurastri R, Sharma N, et al. Outcomes of a Coaching-Based WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program in India. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377(24):2313–24.
13.
Copyright Ownership: This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, adapt, enhance this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.