×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Narrative/Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analysis

Systematic Overview of Remote Patient Monitoring in Nigeria (West Africa)

By
Umarfarouq Idris Orcid logo ,
Umarfarouq Idris
Latifah Abdulkarim Orcid logo ,
Latifah Abdulkarim
Bryan Arkwright
Bryan Arkwright

Abstract

Remote Patient / Physiologic Monitoring (RPM), as a tool helps in eliminating or reducing the cost of care in Nigeria and West Africa, and hence has contributed to the advancement of telemedicine. As a result, telemedicine conserves time and improves cost factors of care delivery by achieving efficiencies through technology while demonstrating quality and outcomes in new and novel ways. This paper looks into the growth and application of RPM in Nigeria. Management of diseases using RPM, measures, and regulations taken to incorporate RPM in Nigeria, and their connectivity to remote and rural areas are all highlighted within the context of this paper. This paper identifies effective utilization of RPM technology as a solution to address problems of poor health care delivery and outcomes in Nigeria by identifying the prevailing limitations mitigating the incorporation and growth of RPM in the country’s healthcare delivery system.

References

1.
Molefi D. The status of telemedicine in Africa. Retrieved from The status of telemedicine in Africa. 2015;
2.
Akintosin J. The status of telemedicine in Africa: The role of broadband. 2015;
3.
4.
Malasinghe LP, Ramzan N, Dahal K. Remote patient monitoring: a comprehensive study. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2017;10(1):57–76.
5.
Ukaoha K, Egbokhare F. Prospects and Challenges of Telemedicine in Nigeria. Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. 2012;(1):65–70.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.