×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Proof of Concept

Emergency Medical Technician-Facilitated Telehealth Visits: A New Model to Expand Home-Based Primary Care for Homebound Seniors

By
Karen A. Abrashkin ,
Karen A. Abrashkin
A. Camille McBride ,
A. Camille McBride
Jill C. Slaboda ,
Jill C. Slaboda
Michael Kurliand ,
Michael Kurliand
Amparo Abel-Bey ,
Amparo Abel-Bey
Atika Turkistani ,
Atika Turkistani
Kayla Finuf ,
Kayla Finuf
Renee Pekmazaris
Renee Pekmazaris

Abstract

Objective: As the number of older adults living in the United States grows, the gap between the capacity of home-based primary care (HBPC) services and the community demand will continue to widen. Older adults, living longer with mobility difficulties and multiple chronic medical conditions, often prefer to age in place, and new models of care are needed to meet this need. This article provides a framework for an innovative emergency medical technician (EMT)-facilitated telehealth program, the mobile telemedicine technician (MTT) program, which aims to increase access to medical care and efficiency within an HBPC program. Design: A descriptive framework outlining the deployment of an innovative telehealth model. Setting: An HBPC program serving homebound seniors in downstate New York. Participants: Homebound individuals enrolled in an HBPC program with advanced age (over half >90 years), 67% with 5–6 activities of daily living (ADL) dependencies, and high rates of dementia, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes requiring evaluation and treatment of acute conditions. Interventions: HBPC program enrollees requiring evaluation and treatment of acute conditions received a home visit from a telehealth-enabled EMT who has received additional training to provide in-home care. Following an evaluation, the EMT facilitated a telehealth visit via a two-way video conference between the patient and the primary care physician. Main outcome measures: Description of a novel telehealth care model, preliminary results from the first 100 MTT visits including the reason for visit, patient/caregiver, physician, and telehealth-enabled EMT satisfaction survey results. Results: The primary care provider was able to evaluate twice as many patients in a given time period using the new model as in the regular home visit care model. The most common visit reasons were related to skin conditions (22%), neurological conditions (19%), cardiovascular conditions (16%), and respiratory conditions (15%). Satisfaction rates were high from patients/caregivers (45% response rate, 60% strongly agreed and 29% agreed that they were satisfied with the care delivery experience), physician (six surveys over time from one physician, 100% strongly agreed on the effectiveness of care delivery model), and telehealth-enabled EMTs (eight surveys from four EMTs, 100% strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the care delivery experience). Conclusions: In this descriptive article, we outline a new model of care using telehealth-enabled EMTs making home visits to connect with a patient’s primary care physician who is centrally located. This model shows promise for expanding primary care services within the home.

References

1.
Ornstein KA, Leff B, Covinsky KE, Ritchie CS, Federman AD, Roberts L, et al. Epidemiology of the Homebound Population in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2015;175(7):1180.
2.
Mather M, Kilduff L, Scommegna P. Fact sheet: Aging in the United States [Internet]. Population Reference Bureau. 2019;
3.
West L, Cole S, Goodkind D, He W. 65 in the United States: 2010 special studies current population reports. 2014;
4.
Soones T, Federman A, Leff B, Siu AL, Ornstein K. Two‐Year Mortality in Homebound Older Adults: An Analysis of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2016;65(1):123–9.
5.
Abrashkin KA, Poku A, Ramjit A, Washko J, Zhang J, Guttenberg M, et al. Community paramedics treat high acuity conditions in the home: a prospective observational study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 2019;14(e1):e683–90.
6.
Stall N, Nowaczynski M, Sinha SK. Systematic Review of Outcomes from Home‐Based Primary Care Programs for Homebound Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2014;62(12):2243–51.
7.
Edes T, Kinosian B, Vuckovic NH, Olivia Nichols L, Mary Becker M, Hossain M. Better Access, Quality, and Cost for Clinically Complex Veterans with Home‐Based Primary Care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2014;62(10):1954–61.
8.
Yao N, Ritchie C, Camacho F, Leff B. Geographic Concentration Of Home-Based Medical Care Providers. Health Affairs. 2016;35(8):1404–9.
9.
Langabeer JR, Champagne-Langabeer T, Alqusairi D, Kim J, Jackson A, Persse D, et al. Cost–benefit analysis of telehealth in pre-hospital care. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2016;23(8):747–51.
10.
Majors-Foley K. Telemedicine in Prehospital Stroke Evaluation and Thrombolysis: Taking Stroke Treatment to the Doorstep. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2016;51(1):93–4.
11.
Winburn AS, Brixey JJ, Langabeer J, Champagne-Langabeer T. A systematic review of prehospital telehealth utilization. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2017;24(7):473–81.
12.
Champagne-Langabeer T, Langabeer JR, Roberts KE, Gross JS, Gleisberg GR, Gonzalez MG, et al. Telehealth Impact on Primary Care Related Ambulance Transports. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2019;23(5):712–7.
13.
Dang S, Olsan T, Karuza J, Cai X, Gao S, Intrator O, et al. Telehealth in Home‐Based Primary Care: Factors and Challenges Associated With Integration Into Veteran Care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2019;67(9):1928–33.
14.
Latus‐Olaifa O, Norman GJ, Kurliand M, Slaboda JC, Abrashkin KA, Smith KL, et al. Not Yet Ready for Prime Time: Video Visits in a Home‐Based Primary Care Program. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2019;67(10):2202–4.
15.
De Cola MC, Maresca G, D’Aleo G, Carnazza L, Giliberto S, Maggio MG, et al. Teleassistance for frail elderly people: A usability and customer satisfaction study. Geriatric Nursing. 2020;41(4):463–7.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.