Methods: A survey was developed and sent to patients participating in a pediatric teleurology program at an academic medical center. This survey evaluated the patient’s history using this telemedicine platform, satisfaction with various aspects of the application as well as associated details about transportation and costs of traditional in-person visits. Results: Of the 50 survey respondents, the majority reported that they found the app easy and comfortable to use as well as just as useful as in-person visits. Respondents also indicated that they incurred lower costs, traveled less, and faced less time lost from work. Conclusions: Telemedicine is a useful tool to enhance low-acuity pediatric urology care while minimizing the financial and opportunity costs of these visits as compared to in-person visits.
Miller A, Rhee E, Gettman M, Spitz A. The current state of telemedicine in urology. Med ClinNorth Am. 2018;(2):387–98.
2.
Huang E, Knight S, Guetter C. Telemedicine and telementoring in the surgical specialties: A narrative review. Am J Surg. 2019;(4):760–6.
3.
Kuo R, Delvecchio F, Babayan R, Preminger G. Telemedicine: Recent developments and future applications. J Endourol. 2001;(1):63–6.
4.
Ray K, Ashcraft L, Mehrotra A, Miller E, Kahn J. Family perspectives on telemedicine for pediatric subspecialty care. 2017;(10):852–62.
5.
Harting M, Wheeler A, Ponsky T. Telemedicine in pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;587–94.
6.
Shivji S, Metcalfe P, Khan A, Bratu I. Pediatric surgery telehealth: Patient and clinician satisfaction. Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;(5):523–6.
7.
The State of Urology Workforce and Practice in the United States. 2015;
8.
De Grood C, Raissi A, Kwon Y, Santana M. Adoption of e-health technology by physicians: A scoping review. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;335–44.
9.
Mayer M, Skinner A. Too many, too few, too concentrated? A review of the pediatric subspecialty workforce literature. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;1158–65.
10.
Bator E, Gleason J, Lorenzo A. The burden of attending a pediatric surgical clinic and family preferences toward telemedicine. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;(10):1776–82.
11.
Finkelstein J, Cahill D, Kurtz M. The use of telemedicine for the postoperative urological care of children: Results of a pilot program. J Urol. 2019;(1):159–63.
12.
Finkelstein J, Cahill D, Young K. Telemedicine for pediatric urologic postoperative care is safe, convenient and economical. J Urol. 2020;
13.
Finkelstein JB, Cahill D, Young K, Humphrey K, Campbell J, Schumann C, et al. Telemedicine for Pediatric Urological Postoperative Care is Safe, Convenient and Economical. Journal of Urology. 2020;204(1):144–8.
14.
Marcin J, Ellis J, Mawis R, Nagrampa E, Nesbitt T, Dimand R. Using telemedicine to provide pediatric subspecialty care to children with special health care needs in an underserved rural community. Pediatrics. 2004;(1 I):1–6.
15.
Whitten P, Love B. Patient and provider satisfaction with the use of telemedicine: Overview and rationale for cautious enthusiasm. J Postgrad Med. 2005;(4):294–300.
16.
Garcia R, Adelakun O. A Conceptual Framework and Pilot Study for Examining Telemedicine Satisfaction Research. Journal of Medical Systems. 2019;43(3).
17.
Canon S, Patel S, A. A pilot study of telemedicine for postoperative urological care in children. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;(8):427–30.
18.
Vallasciani S, Abdo B, Rauf Z. Telehealth for the assessment of patients referred for pediatric urological care: A preliminary cost savings analysis and satisfaction survey. Telemed J eHealth. 2019;(8):756–61.
19.
Kruse C, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, Tran L, Vela J, Brooks M. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;(8):16242.
20.
Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. Br Med J. 2000;(7248):1517–20.
21.
Polinski J, Barker T, Gagliano N, Sussman A, Brennan T, Shrank W. Patients’ satisfaction with and preference for telehealth visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;(3):269–75.
22.
Rimsza M, Hotaling A, Keown M. The use of telemedicine to address access and physician workforce shortages. Pediatrics. 2015;(1):202–9.
23.
Dávalos M, French M, Burdick A, Simmons S. Economic evaluation of telemedicine: Review of the literature and research guidelines for benefit-cost analysis. 2009;(10):933–48.
24.
Martinez K, Rood M, Jhangiani N. Patterns of use and correlates of patient satisfaction with a large nationwide direct to consumer telemedicine service. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;(10):1768–73.
25.
Hofstetter P, Kokesh J, Ferguson A, Hood L. The impact of telehealth on wait time for ENT specialty care. Telemed J E Health. 2010;(5):551–6.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
