×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Original Research

Telemedicine Provides Enhanced Care for Low-Acuity Pediatric Urology Patients

By
Nikka Khorsandi ,
Nikka Khorsandi
Brendon Gros ,
Brendon Gros
Yu-Wen Chiu ,
Yu-Wen Chiu
Aaron D. Martin
Aaron D. Martin

Abstract

Methods: A survey was developed and sent to patients participating in a pediatric teleurology program at an academic medical center. This survey evaluated the patient’s history using this telemedicine platform, satisfaction with various aspects of the application as well as associated details about transportation and costs of traditional in-person visits. Results: Of the 50 survey respondents, the majority reported that they found the app easy and comfortable to use as well as just as useful as in-person visits. Respondents also indicated that they incurred lower costs, traveled less, and faced less time lost from work. Conclusions: Telemedicine is a useful tool to enhance low-acuity pediatric urology care while minimizing the financial and opportunity costs of these visits as compared to in-person visits.

References

1.
Miller A, Rhee E, Gettman M, Spitz A. The current state of telemedicine in urology. Med ClinNorth Am. 2018;(2):387–98.
2.
Huang E, Knight S, Guetter C. Telemedicine and telementoring in the surgical specialties: A narrative review. Am J Surg. 2019;(4):760–6.
3.
Kuo R, Delvecchio F, Babayan R, Preminger G. Telemedicine: Recent developments and future applications. J Endourol. 2001;(1):63–6.
4.
Ray K, Ashcraft L, Mehrotra A, Miller E, Kahn J. Family perspectives on telemedicine for pediatric subspecialty care. 2017;(10):852–62.
5.
Harting M, Wheeler A, Ponsky T. Telemedicine in pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;587–94.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.