Boehringer Ingelheim and IBM collaborate to advance generative AI and foundation models for therapeutic antibody development [Internet. 2023;
2.
Elkhatat AM, Elsaid K, Almeer S. Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity. 19(1).
3.
Doyal AS, Sender D, Nanda M, Serrano RA. Chat GPT and Artificial Intelligence in Medical Writing: Concerns and Ethical Considerations. Cureus. 2023;
4.
Elali FR, Rachid LN. AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community. Patterns. 2023;4(3):100706.
5.
Naddaf M. ChatGPT generates fake data set to support scientific hypothesis. Nature. 2023;623(7989):895–6.
6.
Kousha K, Thelwall M. Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: a summary and review. Vol. 8;37(1):4–12. 2023.
7.
Young L. iThenticate 2.0: advancing research integrity with AI writing detection [Internet. 2023;
8.
Diaz Milian R, Moreno Franco P, Freeman WD, Halamka JD. Revolution or Peril? The Controversial Role of Large Language Models in Medical Manuscript Writing. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2023;98(10):1444–8.
9.
Memon AR, Mavrinac M. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Plagiarism as Reported by Participants Completing the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2020;26(2):1067–88.
10.
Kolhar M, Alameen A. University learning with anti-plagiarism systems. Accountability in Research. 2021;28(4):226–46.
11.
Zimba O, Gasparyan A. Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers. Rheumatology. 2021;59(3):132–7.
12.
I.C.M.J.E. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals [Internet. 2023;
13.
Zhang Y, Liang S, Feng Y, Wang Q, Sun F, Chen S, et al. Automation of literature screening using machine learning in medical evidence synthesis: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews. 2022;11(1).
14.
Portenoy J, West JD. Supervised learning for automated literature review. In: CEUR Workshop Proc. 2019. p. 83–91.
15.
van Dinter R, Tekinerdogan B, Catal C. Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology. 2021;136:106589.
16.
Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I. Machine Learning in Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2019;380(14):1347–58.
17.
Goodfellow IJ, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, et al. Generative adversarial nets [Internet.
18.
Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, Stumpe MC, Wu D, Narayanaswamy A, et al. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs. JAMA. 2016;316(22):2402.
19.
Vintzileos AM, Chavez MR, Romero R. A role for artificial intelligence chatbots in the writing of scientific articles. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023;229(2):89–90.
20.
Lone W, Ho J, Koussayer B, Sujka J. ChatGPT: friend or foe in medical writing? An example of how ChatGPT can be utilized in writing case reports. 2023;
21.
I.B.M. What are AI hallucinations?
22.
Flanagin A, Bibbins-Domingo K, Berkwits M, Christiansen SL. Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge. JAMA. 2023;329(8):637.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
