×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Original Clinical Research

Telehealth Experiences of Autonomic Dysfunction and Parkinson's Disease Patients

By
Sachin Vallamkonda, BA Orcid logo ,
Sachin Vallamkonda, BA
Contact Sachin Vallamkonda, BA

Tufts University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts , United States

Department of Neurology, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center , Boston, Massachusetts , United States

Leah Gorfinkel, BS Orcid logo ,
Leah Gorfinkel, BS

Department of Neurology, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, , Boston, Massachusetts , United States

Lehigh University , Bethlehem , United States

Anna Hohler, MD
Anna Hohler, MD

Tufts University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts , United States

Department of Neurology, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center , Boston, Massachusetts , United States

Boston University School of Medicine , Boston , United States

Abstract

Objective We aim to characterize the telehealth care experiences of autonomic dysfunction and Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients. Background Telemedicine is a popular modality for receiving healthcare. Due to its rising use, ensuring efficacy, satisfaction, and safety is important. Current literature finds high satisfaction, benefitted physical and emotional health, and desired feasibility amongst PD patients. While results are promising, there still exists a dearth of literature describing the experiences of autonomic dysfunction patients as a whole and including qualitative data in analysis of care experiences. Design/Methods We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study using anonymous, survey responses from autonomic dysfunction and PD patients within a large health system. The study questionnaire included both Likert-scale prompts and open responses. Quantitative and qualitative data analyses were incorporated in discussed findings. Results Twenty-five patients with either autonomic dysfunction or PD diagnoses who successfully completed the questionnaire were included. Over 80% of participants were confidently able to access medical appointments and providers via telehealth services. 88% accessed telehealth services without others’ assistance. Conversely, 68% did not agree that telehealth appointments were accessible during impacted internet connection. 92% of respondents, however, felt satisfied with the quality of care from telehealth appointments, with 76% finding the care comparable to in-person visits. Notably, 76% experienced improved care access to care and also had their needs met from telehealth. Among open responses, 43% highlighted how physical barriers and distance hindered in-person attendance. Four responses discussed affected fine motor movements limiting telehealth access. Three preferred in-person appointments, denoting the importance of thorough physical exams. Conclusions Telehealth effectively meets autonomic dysfunction and PD patients’ needs comparably to in-person visits, improves access to care, and delivers high satisfaction. This modality still proves inadequate during limited internet connection and for those with impacted fine motor skills. While telehealth holds promising utility for autonomic dysfunction and PD patients’ care, continued study into furthering accessibility for patients of all abilities and technological constraints is still warranted.

References

1.
Qiang JK, Marras C. Telemedicine in Parkinson’s disease: A patient perspective at a tertiary care centre. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 2015;21(5):525–8.
2.
Mathias CJ. Autonomic diseases: clinical features and laboratory evaluation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2003;74(90003):31iii–41.
3.
Harkey LC, Jung SM, Newton ER, Patterson A. Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth in Rural Settings: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 12(2):53–64.
4.
Colón-Semenza C, Zajac JA, Schwartz A, Darbandsari P, Ellis TD. Experiences from the implementation of physical therapy via telehealth for individuals with Parkinson disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2024;46(8):1593–601.
5.
Bendig J, Wolf AS, Mark T, Frank A, Mathiebe J, Scheibe M, et al. Feasibility of a Multimodal Telemedical Intervention for Patients with Parkinson’s Disease—A Pilot Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 11(4):1074.
6.
Laar A, Silva de Lima AL, Maas BR, Bloem BR, de Vries NM. Successful implementation of technology in the management of Parkinson’s disease: Barriers and facilitators. Clinical Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 2023;8:100188.
7.
Saiyed S, Nguyen A, Singh R. Physician Perspective and Key Satisfaction Indicators with Rapid Telehealth Adoption During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2021;27(11):1225–34.
8.
Xu Y, Feeney MP, Surface M, Novak D, Troche MS, Beck JC, et al. Attitudes Toward Telehealth Services Among People Living With Parkinson’s Disease: A Survey Study. Movement Disorders. 2022;37(6):1289–94.
9.
Venkataraman V, Donohue SJ, Biglan KM, Wicks P, Dorsey ER. Virtual visits for Parkinson disease. Neurology Clinical Practice. 2014;4(2):146–52.
10.
Medicine I. Committee on Evaluating Clinical Applications of Telemedicine. 1996;
11.
Hanson RE, Truesdell M, Stebbins GT, Weathers AL, Goetz CG. Telemedicine vs Office Visits in a Movement Disorders Clinic: Comparative Satisfaction of Physicians and Patients. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. 2019;6(1):65–9.
12.
Wilkinson JR, Spindler M, Wood SM, Marcus SC, Weintraub D, Morley JF, et al. High patient satisfaction with telehealth in Parkinson disease. Neurology Clinical Practice. 2016;6(3):241–51.
13.
Peacock D, Baumeister P, Monaghan A, Siever J, Yoneda J, Wile D. Perception of Healthcare Access and Utility of Telehealth Among Parkinson’s Disease Patients. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques. 2020;47(5):700–4.
14.
Katz M. Telehealth increases access to palliative care for people with Parkinson’s disease and related disorders. Annals of Palliative Medicine. 2020;9(S1):S75–9.
15.
Aging NI. Parkinson’s disease: Causes, symptoms, and treatments. 2022;
16.
Shaver J. The State of Telehealth Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice. 2022;49(4):517–30.
17.
van den Bergh R, Bloem BR, Meinders MJ, Evers LJW. The state of telemedicine for persons with Parkinson’s disease. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2021;34(4):589–97.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.