This editorial reviews and reflects how the approach to Tele-critical care has changed from its first inception, through the COVID pandemic and into todays telemedicine world.
Kalvelage C, Rademacher S, Dohmen S, Marx G, Benstoem C. Decision-Making Authority During Tele-ICU Care Reduces Mortality and Length of Stay—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis*. Critical Care Medicine. 2021;49(7):1169–81.
2.
Kahn JM, Rak KJ, Kuza CC, Ashcraft LE, Barnato AE, Fleck JC, et al. Determinants of Intensive Care Unit Telemedicine Effectiveness. An Ethnographic Study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2019;199(8):970–9.
3.
Biurrill S, Gerhardt W, Arora A. Hospital revenue trends outpatient, home, virtual, and other care settings are becoming more common. a Deloitte Center for Health Solutions Report. Delloite Insights. 2020;
4.
Yoo BK, Kim M, Sasaki T, Melnikow J, Marcin JP. Economic Evaluation of Telemedicine for Patients in ICUs*. Critical Care Medicine. 2016;44(2):265–74.
5.
Kumar S, Merchant S, Reynolds R. Tele-ICU: Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness Approach of Remotely Managing the Critical Care. The Open Medical Informatics Journal. 2013;7(1):24–9.
6.
Lilly CM, Motzkus C, Rincon T, Cody SE, Landry K, Irwin RS. ICU Telemedicine Program Financial Outcomes. Chest. 2017;151(2):286–97.
7.
Bruen C, Valdivia D, Nahum A, Sullivan K. 14: Rapid Implementation of Remote Ventilator Monitoring and Control During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Critical Care Medicine. 2021;49(1):7–7.
8.
Srinivasan SR. Tele-ICU in the Age of COVID-19: Built for This Challenge. The Journal of nutrition, health and aging. 2020;24(5):536–7.
9.
Laudanski K, Scruth E, Winterbottom F, Rastrepo M, Dugar S, Herasevich V, et al. A Survey of Tele-Critical Care State and Needs in 2019 and 2020 Conducted among the Members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Healthcare. 10(8):1445.
10.
Ofoma UR, Maddox TM, Perera C, Waken RJ, Drewry AM, Liu L, et al. Characteristics of U.S. Acute Care Hospitals That Have Implemented Telemedicine Critical Care. Critical Care Explorations. 3(7):e0468.
11.
Breslow MJ, Rosenfeld BA, Doerfler M, Burke G, Yates G, Stone DJ, et al. Effect of a multiple-site intensive care unit telemedicine program on clinical and economic outcomes: An alternative paradigm for intensivist staffing*. Critical Care Medicine. 2004;32(1):31–8.
12.
Guinemer C, Boeker M, Fürstenau D, Poncette AS, Weiss B, Mörgeli R, et al. Telemedicine in Intensive Care Units: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23(11):e32264.
13.
Lilly CM. Hospital mortality, length of stay, and preventable complications among critically ill patients before and after tele-ICU reengineering of critical care processes. JAMA. 2011;305(21).
14.
Projecting the Supply of Non-Primary Care Specialty and Subspecialty Clinicians: 2010-2025. National Center for Health Workforce Analysis. US Department of Health and Human Services HRSA. 2014;
15.
Kleinpell RM, Ely EW, Grabenkort R. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the intensive care unit: An evidence-based review. Critical Care Medicine. 2008;36(10):2888–97.
16.
SCCM | Home [Internet.
17.
Kemp Van Ee S, McKelvey H, Williams T, Shao B, Lin WT, Luu J, et al. Telemedicine Intensive Care Unit (Tele-ICU) Implementation During COVID-19: A Scoping Review. Cureus. 2022;
18.
Rosenfeld BA, Dorman T, Breslow MJ, Pronovost P, Jenckes M, Zhang N, et al. Intensive care unit telemedicine: Alternate paradigm for providing continuous intensivist care. Critical Care Medicine. 2000;28(12):3925–31.
19.
Angus DC. Current and Projected Workforce Requirements for Care of the Critically Ill and Patients With Pulmonary Disease<SUBTITLE>Can We Meet the Requirements of an Aging Population?</SUBTITLE> JAMA. 2000;284(21):2762.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
