Humanism during the COVID-19 pandemic: video call as a strategy to satisfy the communication needs of Intensive Care Unit patients and their family members.
Background: Patients affected by the COVID-19 pandemic required physical/social isolation due to the transmissibility of SARs CoV-2; those hospitalized in healthcare facilities often suffered loneliness due to a complete separation from their loved ones through visitor restrictions.(1) Human contact and movement were restricted to contain the spread of disease. When this kind of restriction must be employed, the “Guidance for Managing Ethical Issues in Infectious Disease Outbreaks”, states that it is necessary to provide people with “effective alternative communication strategies”. (2) Methods: This is an observational descriptive study that uses qualitative variables to analyze information obtained by virtual focus groups consisting of either medical professionals or family members of hospitalized patients in the ICU of the Eugenio Espejo Hospital (EEH) in Quito, Ecuador. Each video call allowed us to assess anonymous opinions concerning communication methods utilized during the delivery of daily clinical updates in the ICU. By focusing on a patient-and family-centered model, this study aims to minimize the impact of social isolation in hospitalized patients through the implementation of regular doctor-led video conference calls with family members, as well as video calls between the patient and family members when feasible.(1) Results: This study evaluates the increased satisfaction of family members and medical professionals with the implementation of video calls when compared to traditional telephone calls. A contrast between the time before implementing the telehealth team and the time afterward was observed in at least five positive characteristics: 1) the general telehealth experience, 2) the clarity of the messages, 3) the quality of care, 4) the sense of comfort, and 5) the improvement of communication. Conclusions: There was a positive effect on communication quality for both family members and medical professionals, increasing their satisfaction in terms of finding new methods to reduce the social isolation enforced by the current pandemic. Nevertheless, the future role of virtual communication remains undefined as we return to individualized face-to-face meetings.
Webb H, Parson M, Hodgson LE, Daswani K. Virtual visiting and other technological adaptations for critical care. Future Healthc J. 2020;Oct;7(3):e93–5.
2.
Stricker KH, Kimberger O, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Mohr U, Rothen HU. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: what makes the difference? Intensive Care Medicine. 2009;35(12):2051–9.
3.
Stricker KH, Niemann S, Bugnon S, Wurz J, Rohrer O, Rothen HU. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: cross-cultural adaptation of a questionnaire. Journal of Critical Care. 2007;22(3):204–11.
4.
Thomas KAS, O’Brien BF, Fryday AT, Robinson EC, Hales MJL, Karipidis S, et al. Developing an Innovative System of Open and Flexible, Patient-Family-Centered, Virtual Visiting in ICU During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Collaboration of Staff, Patients, Families, and Technology Companies. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2021;36(10):1130–40.
5.
Rose L, Yu L, Casey J, Cook A, Metaxa V, Pattison N, et al. Communication and Virtual Visiting for Families of Patients in Intensive Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A UK National Survey. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2021;18(10):1685–92.
6.
Straker JK, Choi MS. Facility and Family Communication during the COVID-19 Visit Restriction: Early Perspectives of Family Members. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 2021;64(8):902–13.
7.
Krewulak KD, Jaworska N, Spence KL, Mizen SJ, Kupsch S, Stelfox HT, et al. Impact of Restricted Visitation Policies during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Communication between Critically Ill Patients, Families, and Clinicians: A Qualitative Interview Study. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2022;19(7):1169–76.
8.
Fritz C, Claude LA, Hamada S, Trosdorf M, Barre H, Yavchitz A, et al. Daily telephone call during the COVID-19 pandemic: perceptions of families and providers. Am J Crit Care. 2022;1;31(1):77–81.
9.
Torres-Muñoz V, Farias-Cortés JD, Reyes-Vallejo LA, Guillén-Díaz-Barriga C. Riesgos y daños en la salud mental del personal sanitario por la atención a pacientes con COVID-19. Rev Mex Urol. 2020;1;80(3):1–9.
10.
Schwarzkopf D, Behrend S, Skupin H, Westermann I, Riedemann NC, Pfeifer R, et al. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Intensive Care Medicine. 2013;39(6):1071–9.
11.
Perkins S. Family presence during Covid-19: learning from one hospital’s journey. NEJM Catalyst. 2022;3(3).
12.
LJ TD. La Familia del Paciente en Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI. 2014;
13.
F LC, P G. El Reto de la Humanización de la Salud en Latinoamérica. In: En: La Humanización de la Salud y el Humanismo Médico en Latinoamérica. 2018.
14.
Buba M, Dulude C, O’Donnell R, Rowan-Legg A, Sloan M, Nelson M, et al. Virtual family-centered rounds: adapting inpatient care during COVID-19 [Internet. Review. 2022;
15.
Voo TC, Senguttuvan M, Tam CC. Family Presence for Patients and Separated Relatives During COVID-19: Physical, Virtual, and Surrogate. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 2020;17(4):767–72.
16.
Barbosa W, Zhou K, Waddell E, Myers T, Dorsey ER. Improving Access to Care: Telemedicine Across Medical Domains. Annual Review of Public Health. 2021;42(1):463–81.
17.
Morillo Enriquez DE, Jimenez Barrera M, Cabrera Olvera JL, Meneses La Riva ME. Experiencias vividas de los cuidadores primarios en el manejo ambulatorio al paciente con COVID-19. Bionatura. 2023;8(3):1–10.
18.
Lessa ARD, Bitercourt VN, Crestani F, Andrade GRH, Costa CAD, Garcia PCR. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient- and Family-Centered Care and on the Mental Health of Health Care Workers, Patients, and Families. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 10.
19.
Kryworuchko J, Heyland DK. Using family satisfaction data to improve the processes of care in ICU. Intensive Care Medicine. 2009;35(12):2015–7.
20.
Dale B, Frivold G. Psychometric testing of the Norwegian version of the questionnaire Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU-24). Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. Volume 11:653–9.
21.
Salud Pública M. Hospital de Especialidades Eugenio Espejo [Internet.
22.
Sikali K. The dangers of social distancing: How COVID‐19 can reshape our social experience. Journal of Community Psychology. 2020;48(8):2435–8.
23.
Ponnapa Reddy M, Kadam U, Lee JDY, Chua C, Wang W, McPhail T, et al. Family satisfaction with intensive care unit communication during the <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 pandemic: a prospective multicentre Australian study Family Satisfaction – COVID ICU. Internal Medicine Journal. 2023;53(4):481–91.
24.
Hulail M. Humanism in medical practice: what, why and how?
25.
Billingsley L. Using Video Conferencing Applications to Share the Death Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Radiology Nursing. 2020;39(4):275–7.
26.
CEPAL OPS. The prolongation of the health crisis and its impact on health, the economy and social development. 2021;
27.
Selman LE, Chao D, Sowden R, Marshall S, Chamberlain C, Koffman J. Bereavement Support on the Frontline of COVID-19: Recommendations for Hospital Clinicians. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2020;60(2):e81–6.
28.
Wakam GK, Montgomery JR, Biesterveld BE, Brown CS. Not Dying Alone — Modern Compassionate Care in the Covid-19 Pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;382(24):e88.
29.
Clinical management of COVID-19: living guideline [Internet. 2022;
30.
Wallace CL, Wladkowski SP, Gibson A, White P. Grief During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Considerations for Palliative Care Providers. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2020;60(1):e70–6.
31.
University JH, Medicine. COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering.
32.
Phua J, Weng L, Ling L, Egi M, Lim CM, Divatia JV, et al. Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2020;8(5):506–17.
33.
Organization WH. Guidance for managing ethical issues in infectious disease outbreaks [Internet. 2016;68.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
