×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Opinion/Perspectives/Commentary

Advent of Patient-Centric Technologies to Combat the High Dropout Rates: Revolutionizing Clinical Trials

By
Harsha Rajasimha Orcid logo
Harsha Rajasimha
Contact Harsha Rajasimha

Jeeva Clinical Trials , Manassas, Virginia , United States

Abstract

The article addresses a critical challenge in medical research: the high dropout rates in clinical trials, which often exceed 30%, posing a threat to therapeutic development. It identifies financial strain, time constraints, and the rigid structure of clinical trial protocols as major contributing factors to participant attrition. The article advocates for a paradigm shift towards patient-centric clinical trials that prioritize the participant experience to enhance retention and ensure diverse and representative study populations. It underscores the role of patient-centric technologies, such as digital platforms and artificial intelligence, in revolutionizing clinical trials. These technologies improve remote accessibility, mitigate financial barriers, streamline patient recruitment, and improve data capture. The integration of AI, in particular, is lauded for its ability to efficiently identify and engage potential participants. The ultimate goal of employing such technologies is to make clinical trials more accessible and inclusive, fostering a more diverse participant base, and yielding results that are representative of the broader population. The article concludes by emphasizing the urgent need for patient-centric methodologies and technologies to overcome the dropout dilemma and advance medical research towards better global health outcomes.

References

1.
Alexander W. The uphill path to successful clinical trials: keeping patients enrolled. P T. 2013;38(4):225–7.
2.
Hwang TJ, Carpenter D, Lauffenburger JC, Wang B, Franklin JM, Kesselheim AS. Failure of Investigational Drugs in Late-Stage Clinical Development and Publication of Trial Results. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2016;176(12):1826.
3.
Fogel DB. Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 2018;11:156–64.
4.
Saeed H, El Naqa I. Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Trials. Machine and Deep Learning in Oncology, Medical Physics and Radiology. 2022. p. 453–501.
5.
Dockendorf MF, Hansen BJ, Bateman KP, Moyer M, Shah JK, Shipley LA. Digitally Enabled, Patient‐Centric Clinical Trials: Shifting the Drug Development Paradigm. Clinical and Translational Science. 2021;14(2):445–59.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.