×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Opinion/Perspectives/Commentary

Emergency Telepsychiatry and the Acute Care Continuum: Creating Value Through Improved Patient Accessibility and Follow-up

By
Prentice A. Tom
Prentice A. Tom

Abstract

I few years ago, I coined the term, “Medicine Without Walls”1 to describe our future healthcare delivery system—an environment where patient and healthcare practitioner are unencumbered by physical location or limitations in access points due to human resource restrictions, where medical information is transferred not only between patient and clinician but also between any number of care practitioners and healthcare institutions—a world where patients have open and ready access to medical care when and where needed.

References

1.
Tom PA. Emergency Telepsychiatry and the Acute Care Continuum: Creating Value Through Improved Patient Accessibility and Follow-up. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2018;2(4).
2.
Mental disorders and/or substance abuse related to one of every eight emergency department cases: AHRQ news and numbers. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
3.
Bender D, Pande N, Lugwig M. A literature review: Psychiatric boarding. ASPE. 2008;
4. :
4–5.
5.
Brokmann J, Rossaint R, Bergrath S. Potential and effectiveness of a telemedical rescue assistance system. Prospective observational study on implementation in emergency medicine]. Anesthetist. 2015;(6):438–45.
6.
Zeller S, Calma N, Stone A. Effects of a Regional Dedicated Psychiatric Emergency Service on Boarding and Hospitalization of Psychiatric Patients in Area Emergency Departments. Dept Interviews & Opinions Tags: CEP America, emergency care. 2014;

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.