Methods: A project conducted from February 2013 to June 2014 investigated the adoption of telemedicine services among purchasers of addiction treatment in five states and one county. The project assessed purchasers’ interest in and perceived facilitators and barriers to implementing one or more of the following telemedicine modalities: telephone-based care, web-based screening, web-based treatment, videoconferencing, smartphone mobile applications (apps), and virtual worlds. Results: Purchasers expressed the most interest in implementing videoconferencing and smartphone mobile devices. Anticipated facilitators for implementing a telemedicine app included funding available to pay for the telemedicine service, local examples of success, influential champions at the payer and treatment agencies, and meeting a pressing need. Greatest barriers identified were costs associated with implementation, lack of reimbursement for telemedicine services, providers’ unfamiliarity with technology, lack of implementation models, and confidentiality regulations. Conclusions: Despite the considerable interest in telemedicine, implementation challenges exist. Future studies should broaden the sample analyzed and track technology implementation longitudinally to help the research and practitioner communities develop a greater understanding of technology implementation trends and practices.
References
1.
Wang J, Wang Y, Wei C, Yao N, Yuan A, Shan Y. Smartphone interventions for long-term health management of chronic diseases: an integrative review. Telemed J E Health. 2014;(6):570–83.
2.
Baca C, Alverson D, Knapp-Manuel J, Blackwell G. Telecounseling in rural areas for alcohol problems. Alcoholism Treat Quart. 2007;(4):31–45.
3.
Young L. Telemedicine interventions for substance-use disorder: a literature review. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;(1):47–53.
4.
Mckay J, Lynch K, Shepard D, Pettinati H. The effectiveness of telephone-based continuing care for alcohol and cocaine dependence: 24-month outcomes. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;(2):199–207.
5.
Mckay J. Continuing care research: what we have learned and where we are going. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;(2):131–45.
6.
Mckay J, Van Horn D, Oslin D, Lynch K, Ivey M, Ward K. A randomized trial of extended telephonebased continuing care for alcohol dependence: within-treatment substance use outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;(6):912–23.
7.
Molfenter T, Boyle M, Holloway D, Zwick J. Trends in Telemedicine Use for Addiction Treatment. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2018;2(4).
Helzer J, Rose G, Badger G, Searles J, Thomas C, Lindberg S. Using interactive voice response to enhance brief alcohol intervention in primary care settings. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008;(2):251–8.
10.
Rose G, Skelly J, Badger G, Ferraro T, Helzer J. Efficacy of automated telephone continuing care following outpatient therapy for alcohol dependence. Addict Behav. 2015;223–31.
11.
Hester R, Delaney H, Campbell W, Handmaker N. A web application for moderation training: initial results of a randomized clinical trial. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;(3):266–76.
12.
Moore B, Fazzino T, Garnet B, Cutter C, Barry D. Computer-based interventions for drug use disorders: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011;(3):215–23.
13.
Khadjesari Z, Murray E, Hewitt C, Hartley S, Godfrey C. Can stand‐alone computer‐based interventions reduce alcohol consumption? A systematic review. Addiction. 2010;106(2):267–82.
14.
Gainsbury S, Blaszczynski A. A systematic review of Internet-based therapy for the treatment of addictions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;(3):490–8.
15.
Neumann T, Neuner B, Weiss-Gerlach E, Tonnesen H, Gentilello L, Wernecke K. The effect of computerized tailored brief advice on at-risk drinking in subcritically injured trauma patients. J Trauma. 2006;(4):805–14.
16.
Squires D, Hester R. Using technical innovations in clinical practice: the drinker’s check-up software program. J Clin Psychol. 2004;(2):159–69.
17.
Molfenter T, Boyle M, Holloway D, Zwick J. Trends in Telemedicine Use for Addiction Treatment. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2018;2(4).
18.
Marsch L, Guarino H, Acosta M, Aponte-Melendez Y, Grabinski C, M. Web-based behavioral treatment for substance use disorders as a partial replacement of standard methadone maintenance treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014;(1):43–51.
19.
Bickel W, Marsch L, Buchhalter A, Badger G. Computerized behavior therapy for opioid-dependent outpatients: a randomized controlled trial. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008;(2):132–43.
20.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. 2013;
21.
Carroll K, Ball S, Martino S, Nich C, Bobuscio T, Nuro K. Computer-assisted delivery of cognitivebehavioral therapy for addiction: a randomized trial of CBT4CBT. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;(7):881–8.
22.
King V, Stoller K, Kidorf M, Kindbom K, Hursh S, Brady T. Assessing the effectiveness of an Internetbased videoconferencing platform for delivering intensified substance abuse counseling. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;(3):331–8.
23.
Frueh B, Henderson S, Myrick H. Telehealth service delivery for persons with alcoholism. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;(7):372–5.
24.
Hyler S, Gangure D, Batchelder S. Can telepsychiatry replace in-person psychiatric assessments? A review and meta-analysis of comparison studies. CNS Spectr. 2005;(5):403–13.
25.
Hilty D, Ferrer D, Parish M, Johnston B, Callahan E, Yellowlees P. The effectiveness of telemental health: a 2013 review. Telemed J E Health. 2013;(6):444–54.
26.
Molfenter T, Boyle M, Holloway D, Zwick J. Trends in Telemedicine Use for Addiction Treatment. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2018;2(4).
27.
Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, Edwards L. The effectiveness of mobile-health technologybased health behaviour change or disease management interventions for healthcare consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013;(1).
28.
Gustafson DH, McTavish FM, Chih MY, Atwood AK, Johnson RA, Boyle MG, et al. A Smartphone Application to Support Recovery From Alcoholism. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(5):566.
29.
Chih M, Patton T, Mctavish F, Isham A, Judkins-Fisher C, Atwood A. Predictive modeling of addiction lapses in a mobile health application. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014;(1):29–35.
30.
Dulin P, Gonzalez V, Campbell K. Results of a pilot test of a self-administered smartphone-based treatment system for alcohol use disorders: usability and early outcomes. Subst Abus. 2014;(2):168–75.
31.
Saladin M, Brady K, Graap K, Rothbaum B. A preliminary report on the use of virtual reality technology to elicit craving and cue reactivity in cocaine dependent individuals. Addict Behav. 2006;(10):1881–94.
32.
Bordnick P, Graap K, Copp H, Brooks J, Ferrer M, Logue B. Utilizing virtual reality to standardize nicotine craving research: a pilot study. Addict Behav. 2004;(9):1889–94.
33.
Culbertson C, Nicolas S, Zaharovits I, London E, De L, Garza 2nd R, et al. Methamphetamine craving induced in an online virtual reality environment. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010;(4):454–60.
34.
Molfenter T, Boyle M, Holloway D, Zwick J. Trends in Telemedicine Use for Addiction Treatment. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2018;2(4).
35.
2011;12–4730.
36.
Eisenhardt K. Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev. 1989;(4):532–50.
37.
Backhaus A, Agha Z, Maglione M, Repp A, Ross B, Zuest D. Videoconferencing psychotherapy: a systematic review. Psychol Serv. 2012;(2):111–31.
38.
Donker T, Petrie K, Proudfoot J, Clarke J, Birch M, Christensen H. Smartphones for smarter delivery of mental health programs: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;(11):247.
39.
Connors B, Leipold J. The 42 CFR Part 2 and NHIN conundrum. Behav Healthc. 2009;(7):52–3.
40.
Weitzel J, Bernhardt J, Usdan S, Mays D, Glanz K. Using wireless handheld computers and tailored text messaging to reduce negative consequences of drinking alcohol. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;(4):534–7.
41.
Vaca F, Winn D, Anderson C, Kim D, Arcila M. Six-month follow-up of computerized alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment in the emergency department. Subst Abuse. 2011;(3):144–52.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
