×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Original Market Research

Telehealth Finance Variables and Successful Business Models

By
Bryan T. Arkwright ,
Bryan T. Arkwright
Monica Leslie ,
Monica Leslie
Morgan Light
Morgan Light

Abstract

Successful telehealth business models are a topic of regular discussion in the healthcare industry, and the financial details of telehealth programs, initiatives, and companies are central to program viability and sustainability. Claims and total payments toward telehealth services are rapidly increasing each year; therefore, it is becoming imperative that organizations carefully navigate the regulatory, financial, operational, and technical aspects impacting, and many times determining, the financial health of telehealth programs. The objective of this article is to define and articulate the financial variables and business models that are the lifeblood of today’s successful telehealth programs, and also to provide insights and information to assist organizations in navigating the nuances of telehealth financial modeling, monitoring, and management.

The financial and business models surrounding telehealth are unique for a number of reasons, mainly because the calculations and architecture of such models often contain many continuous variables, such as people (clinical providers and patients), geography (rural or metropolitan areas), telehealth governance structure, the service provided, the reimbursement or coverage eligibility, the technology used, the quality of care rendered, and the outcome of the care rendered. In addition, a clear need for a departure from traditional ways of projecting return on investment (ROI) becomes apparent with the layering of additional complexities of restrictive payer requirements, various business models, and the transition from volume to value.

References

1.
Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the Provider. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2014;12(6):573–6.
2.
Humer MF, Campling BG. The Role of Telemedicine in Providing Thoracic Oncology Care to Remote Areas of British Columbia. Current Oncology Reports. 2017;19(8).
3.
Binder WJ, Cook JL, Gramze N, Airhart S. Telemedicine in the Intensive Care Unit. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America. 2018;30(2):289–96.
4.
Rat C, Hild S, Rault Sérandour J, Gaultier A, Quereux G, Dreno B, et al. Use of Smartphones for Early Detection of Melanoma: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 20(4):e135.
5.
Flaten HK, St Claire C, Schlager E, Dunnick CA, Dellavalle RP. Growth of mobile applications in dermatology - 2017 update. Dermatology Online Journal. 24(2).
6.
Charlston S, Siller G. Teledermatologist expert skin advice: A unique model of care for managing skin disorders and adverse drug reactions in hepatitis C patients. Australasian Journal of Dermatology. 2018;59(4):315–7.
7.
Lunde P, Nilsson BB, Bergland A, Kværner KJ, Bye A. The Effectiveness of Smartphone Apps for Lifestyle Improvement in Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 20(5):e162.
8.
Tudor-Sfetea C, Rabee R, Najim M, Amin N, Chadha M, Jain M, et al. Evaluation of Two Mobile Health Apps in the Context of Smoking Cessation: Qualitative Study of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Versus Non-CBT-Based Digital Solutions. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 6(4):e98.
9.
Berman SJ, Wada C, Minatodani D, Halliday T, Miyamoto R, Lindo J, et al. Home-Based Preventative Care in High-Risk Dialysis Patients: A Pilot Study. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2011;17(4):283–7.
10.
Overdijkink SB, Velu AV, Rosman AN, van Beukering MD, Kok M, Steegers-Theunissen RP. The Usability and Effectiveness of Mobile Health Technology–Based Lifestyle and Medical Intervention Apps Supporting Health Care During Pregnancy: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 6(4):e109.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.