×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Research Article: Use Case/Pilot/Methodology

Feasibility of Recommending mHealth Solutions to Patients Receiving Virtual Primary Care

By
David McCune ,
David McCune
Erin Graf ,
Erin Graf
Jo Masterson ,
Jo Masterson
Amanda Cuda
Amanda Cuda

Abstract

This pilot program tested the feasibility of connecting patients receiving medical care from 98point6 (a virtual healthcare platform that leverages artificial intelligence and machine learning to deliver primary care through a text-based, smartphone interface) with the 2Morrow app (a behavioral health platform that utilizes acceptance commitment therapy [ACT] to address key chronic disease drivers and conditions). It also evaluated the potential for future clinical research using this methodology.

Materials and methods: Adult patients of 98point6 who expressed one of several behavioral health concerns (tobacco addiction, pain, stress/anxiety, or weight management) were evaluated by a board-certified primary care physician. They were subsequently given the recommendation to download the 2Morrow app and use one of the ACT-based programs at no cost. De-identified data were collected about 2Morrow app usage. Surveys were sent to patients via email at 7 and 28 days post-recommendation to collect information about their experience using the app.

Results: From April to October 2018, 98point6 and 2Morrow conducted a pilot program to offer the 2Morrow app to patients who expressed concern about any of the following topics: tobacco addiction, pain, stress/anxiety, or weight management. 98point6 providers recommended the 2Morrow app to 28 patients, 16 of whom downloaded the app and used at least one 2Morrow program. Five patients used multiple modules within the 2Morrow app. De-identified data are presented regarding those patients who used the app and which modules were accessed and with what frequency. Four patients completed the post-recommendation user surveys.

Conclusions: The 98point6 virtual healthcare patients showed good adherence to the recommendation for ACT delivered through a mobile app. Patients followed through on physician recommendations at rates equivalent to similar published studies. A clinical trial to measure patient satisfaction, compliance, and outcomes is feasible. The ability to treat several behavioral health concerns commonly seen in primary care using an entirely digital healthcare plan deserves additional study.

References

1.
Bair MJ, Wu J, Damush TM, Sutherland JM, Kroenke K. Association of Depression and Anxiety Alone and in Combination With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Primary Care Patients. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2008;70(8):890–7.
2.
Japuntich S, Zehner M, Smith S, Jorenby D, Valdez J, Fiore M, et al. Smoking cessation via the Internet: A randomized clinical trial of an Internet intervention as adjuvant treatment in a smoking cessation intervention. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2006;8(1):59–67.
3.
Zeng EY, Heffner JL, Copeland WK, Mull KE, Bricker JB. Get with the program: Adherence to a smartphone app for smoking cessation. Addictive Behaviors. 2016;63:120–4.
4.
Martínez-Pérez B, de la Torre-Díez I, López-Coronado M. Mobile Health Applications for the Most Prevalent Conditions by the World Health Organization: Review and Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 15(6):e120.
5.
Anthes E. Mental health: There’s an app for that. Nature. 2016;532(7597):20–3.
6.
Langarizadeh M, Tabatabaei M, Tavakol K, Naghipour M, Moghbeli F. Telemental Health Care, an Effective Alternative to Conventional Mental Care: a Systematic Review. Acta Informatica Medica. 2017;25(4):240.
7.
Lillis J, Kendra KE. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for weight control: Model, evidence, and future directions. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2014;3(1):1–7.
8.
Dahl J, Wilson KG, Nilsson A. Acceptance and commitment therapy and the treatment of persons at risk for long-term disability resulting from stress and pain symptoms: A preliminary randomized trial. Behavior Therapy. 2004;35(4):785–801.
9.
Forman EM, Herbert JD, Moitra E, Yeomans PD, Geller PA. A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Therapy for Anxiety and Depression. Behavior Modification. 2007;31(6):772–99.
10.
Abrantes AM, Strong DR, Lejuez CW, Kahler CW, Carpenter LL, Price LH, et al. The role of negative affect in risk for early lapse among low distress tolerance smokers. Addictive Behaviors. 2008;33(11):1394–401.
11.
West R. Tobacco smoking: Health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychology & Health. 2017;32(8):1018–36.
12.
Vowles KE, McCracken LM. Acceptance and values-based action in chronic pain: A study of treatment effectiveness and process. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 76(3):397–407.
13.
Veehof MM, Oskam MJ, Schreurs KMG, Bohlmeijer ET. Acceptance-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2011;152(3):533–42.
14.
Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain — United States, 2016. MMWR Recommendations and Reports. 65(1):1–49.
15.
Nahin RL. Estimates of Pain Prevalence and Severity in Adults: United States, 2012. The Journal of Pain. 2015;16(8):769–80.
16.
Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2002;52(2):69–77.
17.
Mojtabai R, Olfson M, Han B. National Trends in the Prevalence and Treatment of Depression in Adolescents and Young Adults. Pediatrics. 2016;138(6).
18.
Vidrine JI, Shete S, Cao Y, Greisinger A, Harmonson P, Sharp B, et al. Ask-Advise-Connect. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2013;173(6):458.
19.
Siu AL. Behavioral and Pharmacotherapy Interventions for Tobacco Smoking Cessation in Adults, Including Pregnant Women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2015;163(8):622–34.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.