×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Narrative/Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analysis

Telemedicine: Bridging the Gap in Providing Primary Care to Rural Area Patients Across India

By
Aswini Ashokan Naidu Orcid logo
Aswini Ashokan Naidu
Contact Aswini Ashokan Naidu

M-Swasth Solutions Private Limited , Gurgaon , India

Abstract

Telemedicine has emerged as a transformative solution to address the significant healthcare disparities faced by rural India, where over 70% of the population resides. In this article, the evolution of telemedicine in India, its current landscape, and its potential to revolutionize primary healthcare delivery in rural areas are reviewed. Despite progress in establishing Primary Health Centers, rural healthcare infrastructure remains underutilized due to staffing shortages and other challenges. Telemedicine offers a lifeline by bridging critical gaps in primary care, with government initiatives such as E-Sanjeevni and private entities such as M-Swasth and Apollo TeleHealth expanding access to healthcare services.  The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of more advanced, patient-centric telemedicine models incorporating artificial intelligence, machine learning, and Internet of Things technologies. These innovations aim to provide rural communities with healthcare standards comparable to urban areas. However, challenges persist, including technological barriers, digital literacy gaps, and concerns about data security and privacy.  To fully realize telemedicine’s potential, a multifaceted approach is necessary. This includes culturally adapting platforms for rural populations, strengthening data protection legislation, enhancing digital infrastructure, and increasing digital literacy. The collaborative efforts of government bodies, private enterprises, healthcare professionals, and non-profit private organizations are crucial in overcoming these challenges. By embracing telemedicine and addressing its implementation barriers, India can bridge the healthcare gap, improve the quality of life for millions of rural residents, and potentially catalyze economic development in rural areas. 

References

1.
Bagchi S. Telemedicine in Rural India. PLoS Medicine. 3(3):e82.
2.
Aayog NITI. *Home*.
3.
Parthasarathi A, George T, Kalimuth MB, Jayasimha S, Kaleem Ullah M, Patil R, et al. Exploring the potential of telemedicine for improved primary healthcare in India: a comprehensive review. The Lancet Regional Health - Southeast Asia. 2024;27:100431.
4.
Becoming a certified telemedicine professional: Here’s how to take telemedicine to the next level. *Podiatry Management. 2021;40*(6:151–6.
5.
Jagarapu J, Savani RC. A brief history of telemedicine and the evolution of teleneonatology. Seminars in Perinatology. 2021;45(5):151416.
6.
Shah N. *Insights10*.
7.
Patil AV, Somasundaram KV, Goyal RC. CURRENT HEALTH SCENARIO IN RURAL INDIA. Australian Journal of Rural Health. 2002;10(2):129–35.
8.
India G. *Reports*.
9.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
10.
Alenoghena CO, Ohize HO, Adejo AO, Onumanyi AJ, Ohihoin EE, Balarabe AI, et al. Telemedicine: A Survey of Telecommunication Technologies, Developments, and Challenges. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks. 12(2):20.
11.
Bahrani K, Singh MB, Bhatia R, Prasad K, Vibha D, Shukla G, et al. Telephonic review for outpatients with epilepsy—A prospective randomized, parallel group study. Seizure. 2017;53:55–61.
12.
Lestari HM, Miranda AV, Fuady A. Barriers to telemedicine adoption among rural communities in developing countries: A systematic review and proposed framework. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2024;28:101684.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.