Background: Acute unscheduled episodic care is an area of potential cost savings, given the high frequency and cost of unnecessary emergency department (ED) utilization. Methods: We developed a provider-assisted patient navigation program using a telehealth platform designed to decrease ED utilization and reduce costs while providing exceptional patient satisfaction. Results: Urgent care (UC) visits were analyzed from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023. The “ED comparison” group (n = 68,320) consisted of patients discharged to home after receiving care in the ED. The “avoided ED visits” group included patients (n = 7,430) who received care in a lower-acuity setting and did not require emergency services within 48 hours. The calculated overall medical expense savings comparing the costs between the ED vs. lower-acuity settings revealed that 50% (n = 450) of consultations were managed as outpatients, avoiding ED visits. Evaluation of distribution by source revealed that 67% of ConnectCare consults resulted in admission, 48% for UC, while 36% of patients were service center consults. Conversely, 31% of consultations resulted in recommendations to go to the ED, and 16% of these were assisted transfers where the Telehealth Emergency Medicine (TeleEM) clinician communicated with the receiving ED. Among the 280 patients directed to the ED, 243 were sent because of immediate clinical acuity, 28 were because of logistical or scheduling issues, three for non-qualifying insurance for outpatient workup, and six were redirected to the ED following diagnostic results. Our analysis suggests an estimated average avoided medical expense of $1,701 per case to insurers and patients if an ED visit was avoided. Conclusion: Implementing a TeleEM program to assist with triage and resource alignment, as well as identification and outpatient management of patients while avoiding an ED visit, is feasible within an integrated health system. Our TeleEM program may be a model for other integrated health systems.
Mohr NM, Schuette AR, Ullrich F, Mack LJ, DeJong K, Camargo Jr CA, et al. An economic and health outcome evaluation of telehealth in rural sepsis care: a comparative effectiveness study. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. 2022;11(10):703–16.
2.
Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, Tran L, Vela J, Brooks M. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016242.
3.
Schröder H, Beckers SK, Borgs C, Rossaint R, Felzen M. Update Telenotfallmedizin. Die Anaesthesiologie. 2023;72(7):506–17.
4.
Mouzoon JL, Lloyd-McLennan A, Marcin JP. Emergency Medicine Physicians’ Perceptions of Pediatric Tele-Emergency Services. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2020;26(7):955–8.
5.
Tsou C, Robinson S, Boyd J, Jamieson A, Blakeman R, Yeung J, et al. Effectiveness of Telehealth in Rural and Remote Emergency Departments: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23(11):e30632.
6.
MacKinney AC, Ward MM, Ullrich F, Ayyagari P, Bell AL, Mueller KJ. The Business Case for Tele-emergency. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2015;21(12):1005–11.
7.
Sikka N, Gross H, Joshi AU, Shaheen E, Baker MJ, Ash A, et al. Defining emergency telehealth. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2021;27(8):527–30.
8.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2019;95:103208.
9.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2009;42(2):377–81.
10.
Alter N, Arif H, Wright DD, Martinez B, Elkbuli A. Telehealth Utilization in Trauma Care: The Effects on Emergency Department Length of Stay and Associated Outcomes. The American SurgeonTM. 2023;89(11):4826–34.
11.
Rice T, Rosenau P, Unruh LY, Barnes AJ. United States: Health system review. *Health Systems in Transition. 2020;22*(4:1–441.
12.
Edwards G, O’Shea JE. Is telemedicine suitable for remotely supporting non-tertiary units in providing emergency care to unwell newborns? Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2024;109(1):5–10.
13.
Sarpourian F, Ahmadi Marzaleh M, Fatemi Aghda SA, Zare Z. Application of Telemedicine in the Ambulance for Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 2023;38(6):774–9.
14.
Totten A, Womack DM, McDonagh MS, Davis-O’Reilly C, Griffin JC, Blazina I, et al. Improving rural health through telehealth-guided provider-to-provider communication. 2022.
15.
Samson LTW, Turrini G. Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Office of Health Policy. In: National survey trends in telehealth use in 2021: Disparities in utilization and audio vs video services. 2021.
16.
Potter J, Watson Gans D, Gardner A, O’Neill J, Watkins C, Husain I. Using Virtual Emergency Medicine Clinicians as a Health System Entry Point (Virtual First): Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 25:e42840.
17.
Lane BH, Mallow PJ, Hooker MB, Hooker E. Trends in United States emergency department visits and associated charges from 2010 to 2016. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2020;38(8):1576–81.
18.
Teisberg E, Wallace S, O’Hara S. Defining and Implementing Value-Based Health Care: A Strategic Framework. Academic Medicine. 2020;95(5):682–5.
19.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.