×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Narrative/Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analysis

The Use of Telehealth Technology in the Medical Management of Adults with Intellectual Disability: A Scoping Review.

By
Chuka Bonaventure Ohazuruike, MPH Orcid logo ,
Chuka Bonaventure Ohazuruike, MPH

1 School of Medicine, University of Limerick , Limerick , Ireland

Sarah Abere Orcid logo ,
Sarah Abere
Contact Sarah Abere

Department of Internal Medicine, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital , Port Harcourt , Nigeria

Boma Oyan, MD Orcid logo
Boma Oyan, MD

Department of Internal Medicine, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital , Port Harcourt , Nigeria

Abstract

Background: Individuals with intellectual disability (ID) experience substantial inequalities and barriers accessing health care despite requiring constant accessibility to healthcare providers as they are more likely to die from avoidable causes of death than those without ID. Telehealth technologies have the capacity to improve access to health providers and health information and could greatly reduce morbidity and mortality rates in people with ID. This study aims to explore the use of mobile health technology in the medical management of adults with intellectual disability. Methodology: PubMed, IEEE Explore, ACM, and Scopus databases were examined to extract peer-reviewed articles published from January 2000 to January 2022. Original research, published in English and focused on the use of telehealth technologies in the medical management of intellectual disability were deemed eligible. A narrative synthesis of the results was completed, structured around the characteristics of telehealth technologies used and the outcomes of the studies. Results: Thirteen of 1008 reviewed articles were considered eligible for inclusion. Most of the studies used videoconferencing platforms for real-time telehealth, while others focused on symptom or medication monitoring applications. The evidence supports the feasibility, potential effectiveness and satisfaction of using telehealth to manage intellectual disability among adults despite accessibility issues including poor internet connectivity and poor knowledge of technology which may limit its use. Conclusion: The use of telehealth was feasible, acceptable and potentially effective for the management of ID among adults though the varied methodology of included studies maybe inadequate. A more structured methodology will be useful in future studies.    

References

1.
Catalyst NEJM. What is telehealth?
2.
Shawler LA, Clayborne JC, Nasca B, O’Connor JT. An intensive telehealth assessment and treatment model for an adult with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2021;111:103876.
3.
Thang T, Liang A, Choi Y, Parrales A, Kuang SH, Kurniawan S, et al. Providing and Accessing Support During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experiences of Mental Health Professionals, Community and Vocational Support Providers, and Adults with ASD. Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 2021. p. 1–6.
4.
Gosens LCF, Otten R, de Jonge JM, Schellekens AFA, VanDerNagel JEL, Didden R, et al. Development of a personalised substance use disorder treatment for people with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning: An intervention mapping approach. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability. 2022;47(2):131–40.
5.
Johnsson G, Bulkeley K. Practitioner and Service User Perspectives on the Rapid Shift to Teletherapy for Individuals on the Autism Spectrum as a Result of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(22):11812.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.